KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering / 2022 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Poet Classification Using ANN and DNN

Ekin EKİNCİ
Hidayet TAKCI
Sultan ALAGÖZ
Sayfa
10–20
Yayın Tarihi
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result of the experiments it has been seen that MLP has the highest performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F-score.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Since statistical analysis of poetry is a challenging task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), making inferences about the poets also becomes a very challenging task.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, a dataset of Turkish poems which is obtained for 5 different poets is used to compare classification performance of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result of the experiments it has been seen that MLP has the highest performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F-score.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Poet classification · Classification · Natural Language Processing (NLP)

Abstract

Since statistical analysis of poetry is a challenging task in Natural Language Processing (NLP), making inferences about the poets also becomes a very challenging task. In this study, a dataset of Turkish poems which is obtained for 5 different poets is used to compare classification performance of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures. While Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) is selected for ANN architecture, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is selected as DNN architecture. Two main feature representation approaches are used for the experiments- Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) is used for ANN and word embedding is used for DNN. As a result of the experiments it has been seen that MLP has the highest performance in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F-score.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKİNCİ, E., TAKCI, H., ALAGÖZ, S. (2022). Poet Classification Using ANN and DNN. Electronic Letters on Science and Engineering, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 10–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/414690

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. E. Ekinci, “Using authorship analysis techniques in forensic analysis of electronic mails,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Computer Eng., Gebze Techinal Univ., Kocaeli, Turkey, 2013. T. C. Mendenhall, “Characteristic curves of composition,” AAAS, vol. 9, no. 214, pp. 237–246, Mar. 1887, doi: 10.1126/science.ns-9.214S.237. F. Mosteller and D. L. Wallace, “Inference in authorship problem,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 58, no. 302, pp. 275–309, Jun. 1963, doi: 10.2307/2283270. D. Holmes, “Authorship attribution,” Comput. Hum., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 87–106, Apr. 1994, doi: 10.1007/BF01830689. D. Holmes, “The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship,” Lit. Ling. Comput., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 111–117, Sept. 1998, doi: 10.1093/llc/13.3.111. A. McEnery and M. Oakes, “Authorship studies/textual statistics,” in Handbook of Natural Language Processing, R. Dale, H. Moisl and H. Somers, Eds., Dallas, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2000, pp. 234–248. A. Rico-Sulayes, “Statistical authorship attribution of Mexican drug traficking online forum posts,” Int. J. Speech, Lang. Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 53–74, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1558/ijsll.v18i1.53. P. Hajek and R. Henriques, “Mining corporate annual reports for intelligent detection of financial statement fraud--A comparative study of machine learning methods,” Knowl.-Based Syst., vol. 128, pp. 139–152, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.05.001. R. Jindal, R. Malhotra and A. Jain, “Techniques for text classification: literature review and current trends,” Webology, vol. 12, no. 2, 2015.
  2. R. Zheng, J. Li, H. Chen and Z. Huang, “A framework for authorship identification of online messages: writing-style features and classification techniques,” JASIST, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 378–393, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1002/asi.20316. S. Ouamour and H. Sayoud, “Authorship attribution of ancient texts written by ten Arabic travelers using a smo-svm classifier,” in Proc. 2012 Int. Conf. on Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), Jun. 2012, pp. 44–47, doi: 10.1109/ICCITechnol.2012.6285841. P. Varela, M. Albonico, E. Justino and J. Assis, “Authorship attribution in Latin languages using stylometry,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 729–735, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2020.9082216. A. Pandian, V. V. Ramalingam and R. P. V. Preet, “Authorship identification for Tamil classical poem (Mukkoodar Pallu) using C4.5 algorithm,” Indian J. Sci., vol. 9, no. 47, pp. 1–5, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i47/107944. A. S. Altheneyan and M. C. Menai, “N