KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Aquatic Research / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Phylogenetic analysis of Luciobarbus Heckel, 1843 and Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816 species in the Euphrates River (Turkey) based on mtDNA COI gene sequences

Arif PARMAKSIZ
Elif KORKMAZ
Dilara ULUSAL
Necmettin DOĞAN
Sayfa
129–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In future studies, it is recommended to evaluate the data in this study, to determine the genetic characteristics of populations, and to carry out conservation studies at the population level.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Natural fish species living in the Euphrates River System; It is subject to some pressures such as overfishing, competition with invasive species and habitat loss.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result of these pressures, it leads to the decrease of endemic and native species.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In future studies, it is recommended to evaluate the data in this study, to determine the genetic characteristics of populations, and to carry out conservation studies at the population level.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Barbus

Özet

Natural fish species living in the Euphrates River System; It is subject to some pressures such as overfishing, competition with invasive species and habitat loss. As a result of these pressures, it leads to the decrease of endemic and native species. At the beginning of these species are the species belonging to the Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816 and Luciobarbus Heckel, 1843 genera, which have high economic importance. In this study, phylogenetic analysis of the species belonging to the genus Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816 and Luciobarbus Heckel, 1843, which live naturally in the Euphrates River, was carried out with mtDNA COI gene sequences. 17 fish samples belonging to five species from three localities belonging to the Euphrates river system (Turkey) were studied. Total DNA extraction was performed from muscle tissue using Commercial Kit. Then the mtDNA COI region was amplified by PCR and sequenced. Genetic distance values were calculated between 0.00201 and 0.15332, and it was determined that the closest species were L. xanthopterus and L. esocinus, and the most distant species were B. lacerta and A. grypus. In addition, phylogenetic analyzes of the target species were made and an phylogenetic tree was formed and the species were distinguished. In future studies, it is recommended to evaluate the data in this study, to determine the genetic characteristics of populations, and to carry out conservation studies at the population level.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PARMAKSIZ, A., KORKMAZ, E., ULUSAL, D., DOĞAN, N. (2022). Phylogenetic analysis of Luciobarbus Heckel, 1843 and Barbus Cuvier & Cloquet, 1816 species in the Euphrates River (Turkey) based on mtDNA COI gene sequences. Aquatic Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 129–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/414327

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Cognetti, G., Maltagliati, F. (2000). Biodiversity and adaptive mechanisms in brackish water fauna. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 7e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00173-3
  2. Darabi, A.R., Kashan, N., Fayazi, J., Aminafshar, M., Chamani, M. (2014). Investigation of phylogenetic relationship among two Barbus species (Cyprinidae) populations with mitochondrial DNA using PCR sequencing. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 4 (2), 302-311.
  3. Frankham, R., Briscoe, D.A., Ballou, J.D. (2002). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808999
  4. Gozlan R.E., Britton J.R., Cowx I., Copp G.H. (2010). Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 751-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095- 8649.2010.02566.x Jackson M.C., Wasserman R.J., Grey J., Ricciardi A., Dick J.T.A., Alexander M.E. (2017). Novel and disrupted trophic links following invasion. Advances in Ecological Research, 57, 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.006
  5. Korkmaz, M. (2017). Türkiye'de yayılış gösteren Barbus spp. (Pisces: Cyprinidae) türlerinin coğrafik varyasyonlarının araştırılması. Doctor’s thesis, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Biology, pp: 125. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C., Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  6. Kuru, M. (1986). Dicle ve Fırat Nehirleri üzerinde kurulacak barajlarla soyu tehlikeye girecek balık türleri. VIII. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 3-5 Eylül 1986, İzmir. Cilt II Hidrobiyoloji Seksiyonu, 589-597.
  7. Liu, G., Zhou, L. (2016). Population genetic structure and molecular diversity of the red swamp crayfish in China based on mtDNA COI gene sequences. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 28(6), 860-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2016.1199022
  8. Manel, S., Guerin, P.E., Mouillot, D., Blanchet, S., Velez, L., Albouy, C., Pellissier, L. (2020). Global determinants of freshwater and marine fish genetic diversity. Nature Communications, 11(1), 692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14409-7
  9. Mollot, G., Pantel, J.H., Romanuk, T.N. (2017). The effects of invasive species on the decline in species richness: a global meta-analysis. Advances in Ecological Research, 56, 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.002
  10. Parmaksız, A. (2020). Population ge