KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

The Effects of Differentiated Science Teaching According to the Grid Model

Serkan DEMİR
Sayfa
147–159
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Within the scope of the study, it has revealed that its applications differentiated according to the Grid Model have a significant effect on the creative thinking and problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine the effect of science lesson activities prepared in accordance with the components and steps of the grid model on the creative thinking skills, problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group consisted of 44 students (23 in the experimental group, 21 in the control group) in the 9-10 age group, who were identified as gifted students and who attend the same Science and Art Center support education program in Istanbul.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Within the scope of the study, it has revealed that its applications differentiated according to the Grid Model have a significant effect on the creative thinking and problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of science lesson activities prepared in accordance with the components and steps of the grid model on the creative thinking skills, problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students. In this study, pre-test and post-test design with the control group were utilized among the experimental designs. The study group consisted of 44 students (23 in the experimental group, 21 in the control group) in the 9-10 age group, who were identified as gifted students and who attend the same Science and Art Center support education program in Istanbul. The analysis revealed that the differentiated implementations of Science according to the Grid Model had a significant impact on the creative thinking and problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students. In this study, the “Problem Solving Inventory for Primary Education Children” developed by Serin, Bulut Serin and Saygılı (2010), the “Attitude Scale towards the Science Course” created by Kenar and Balcı (2012), and Torrance Creative Figural A booklet, one of the Thinking Tests, were used. Within the scope of the study, it has revealed that its applications differentiated according to the Grid Model have a significant effect on the creative thinking and problem-solving skills and attitudes of gifted students

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, S. (2021). The Effects of Differentiated Science Teaching According to the Grid Model. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 147–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/414310

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akkanat, Ç. (2012). İ lköğ retim 7. sınıf ö ğ rencilerinin bilimsel yaratıcılık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi,
  2. Tokat. Akkaş, E. (2014). Farklılaştırılmış problem çö zme ö ğ retiminin ü stü n zekâlı ve yetenekli ö ğ rencilerin matematik problemlerini çö zmelerine, tutumlarına ve yaratıcı d ü ş ü n m e l e r i n e etkileri. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi,
  3. Bolu. Altun, M., & Arslan, Ç. (2006). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin problem çözme stratejilerini öğrenmeleri üzerine bir çalışma, Uludağ Üniversitesi E ğ itim Fakü ltesi Dergisi, 19 (1), Bursa. Anderson, K. M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 49-53.
  4. Aslan, A.E. (2001). Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünce Testi’nin Türkçe Versiyonu. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatü rk E ğ itim Fakü ltesi Eğ itim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14, 19-40. Ashman A.F, & Conway, R. F. (1997), An introduction to cognitive education. Theory and applications. New York, NY: Routledge. Beler, Y. (2010). Farklılaştırılmış ö ğ retim ortamının sınıf yönetimine ve ö ğ rencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi.Unpublished master’s thesis. Maltepe Üniversitesi,
  5. İstanbul.
  6. Beecher, M. & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differerentiation: one school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19 (3), 502- 530 Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel a r a ş t ı r m a y ö nt e m l e r i. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Biological Science Curriculum Study (2006). Why Does Inquiry Matter? Because That’s What Science Is All About! Kendall/ Hunt Publıshıng Company, ABD. Callahan, C. M. (2017). The characteristics of gifted and talented students. In Fundamentals of Gifted Education. London: Routledge. Candar, H. (2009). Fen eğ itiminde yaratıcı dü şü nme ö ğ retim tekniklerinin ö ğ rencilerin akademik başarı, tutum ve motivasyonlarına etkisi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Marmara Üniversitesi,
  7. İstanbul.
  8. Chen, Y.H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: college EFL lear ne rs’ pe rspec tive s on tie red performance tasks. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, The University of New Orleans. Cooper, C. R., Baum, S. M., & Neu, T. W. (2004). Developing scientific talent in students with special needs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(4), 162-169.
  9. Coulter, S.E. & Groen