Dergiler / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Selective intubation with endotracheal tube introducer in difficult airway: A randomized, prospective, cross‑over study

Sayfa
205–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Expanding the use of ETI and increasing the experience of the practitioners can contribute to further success.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: Selective lung intubation is a life‑saving procedure in emergency departments.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized, prospective, cross‑over study using the 90° rotation technique for selective intubation on a manikin model with and without endotracheal tube introducer (ETI) in difficult airway settings.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Expanding the use of ETI and increasing the experience of the practitioners can contribute to further success.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

BACKGROUND: Selective lung intubation is a life‑saving procedure in emergency departments. While various equipment can be used in selective lung intubation, most of this equipment is not readily available; therefore, single‑lumen endotracheal intubations are performed for rapid interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized, prospective, cross‑over study using the 90° rotation technique for selective intubation on a manikin model with and without endotracheal tube introducer (ETI) in difficult airway settings. Forty‑six emergency physicians were included in the study. The primary outcome was evaluating time to selective intubations, and secondary outcomes were first and second attempt success rates and the self‑perceived difficulty level of each method according to the participants. RESULTS: The mean time to the first successful endotracheal intubation was significantly longer for both right selective and left selective intubations with ETI utilization than without ([39.71 ± 9.83 vs. 21.86 ± 5.94 s], [P < 0.001]), ([42.2 ± 10.81 vs. 26.23 ± 7.97 s], [P < 0.001], respectively). The first‑pass success rate did not differ for right selective intubation with or without an ETI (45/46 [97.8%] and 45/46 [97.8%], respectively). However, the first‑pass success rate for left selective intubation was significantly higher with ETI as compared to without an ETI (30/46 [65.2%] and 13/46 [28.3%], respectively) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the success rates of right selective intubation were the same, the left selective intubation success rates with ETI are higher than the styletted endotracheal tube, which can be strong evidence for this method’s applicability in practice. Expanding the use of ETI and increasing the experience of the practitioners can contribute to further success.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZEROL, H., ŞANCI, E., KARAKAYALI, O., AYDIN, E., HALHALLİ, H. C. (2021). Selective intubation with endotracheal tube introducer in difficult airway: A randomized, prospective, cross‑over study. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 205–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/414167

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, et al. Effect of use of a bougie vs endotracheal tube and stylet on first‑attempt ıntubation success among patients with difficult airways undergoing emergency ıntubation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:2179-89
  2. Bora V, Kritzmire SM, Arthur ME. Double lumen endobronchial tubes. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: h t t p s: / / w w w. n c b i. n l m. n i h. g o v / b o o k s / N B K 535366/. [Last accessed on 2021 Mar 08]
  3. Huang P, Zhou R, Lu Z, Hang Y, Wang S, Huang Z. GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: A randomized, controlled, prospective trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20:119
  4. Driver B, Dodd K, Klein LR, Buckley R, Robinson A, McGill JW, et al. The bougie and first-pass success in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2017;70:473-80
  5. Merelman AH. The case for bougie use on every ıntubation. Air Med J 2020;39:18-9
  6. Gottlieb M, Sharma V, Field J, Rozum M, Bailitz J. Utilization of a gum elastic bougie to facilitate single lung intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:2408-10
  7. Bair AE, Doherty MJ, Harper R, Albertson TE. An evaluation of a blind rotational technique for selective mainstem intubation. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:1105-7
  8. Mangar D, Kirchhoff GT, Derasari M, Laborde R. Left bronchial intubation by a single-lumen tube in adults: Effects of bevel and curvature. South Med J 1994;87:1129-31
  9. Kubota H, Kubota Y, Toyoda Y, Ishida H, Asada A, Matsuura H. Selective blind endobronchial intubation in children and adults. Anesthesiology 1987;67:587-9
  10. Ohchi F, Komasawa N, MiharaR, Hattori K, Minami T. Evaluation of gum-elastic bougie combined with direct and indirect laryngoscopes in vomitus setting: A randomized simulation trial. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:584-8
  11. Juergens AL 2nd, Odom BW, Ren CE, Meyers KE. Success rates with digital ıntubation: Comparing unassisted, stylet, and gum‑elastic bougie techniques. Wilderness Environ Med 2019;30:52-5
  12. Ozbek AE, Halhalli HC, Yilmaz S, Celik E, Ozerol H, Şancı E. Effects of using an endotracheal tube ıntroducer for ıntubation during mechanical chest compressions of a manikin: Randomized, prospective, crossover study. J Emerg Med 2020;59:56-60.