KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tüberküloz ve Toraks / 2021 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults

Spirometri ve impuls karşılaştırması metakolin meydan okumasında osilometri hava yolu tespiti için test yetişkinlerde aşırı duyarlılık

Masoud NAZEMIYAH
Khalil ANSARIN
Masoud NOURIVASKEH
Tohid SADEGI
Akbar SHARIFI
Sayfa
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our study suggested the utility of IOS in addition to conventional spirometry as a method of choice in MCT for detection of AHR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults Introduction: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The primary endpoint was to compare the methacholine dosage causing a 20% drop in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), with methacholine dosage that causing 40% increasing the baseline respiratory resistance at 5 hertz (R5), as measured by IOS.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our study suggested the utility of IOS in addition to conventional spirometry as a method of choice in MCT for detection of AHR.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults Introduction: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry to methacholine for AHR detection among individuals with clinically hyper-reactive airway disease suggestive of bronchial asthma and baseline spirometry were normal. Materials and Methods: Adults with symptoms suggestive of AHR and normal baseline spirometry test were selected. The short protocol of methacholine challenge test (MCT) was performed for all subjects using IOS and spirometry simultaneously. The primary endpoint was to compare the methacholine dosage causing a 20% drop in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), with methacholine dosage that causing 40% increasing the baseline respiratory resistance at 5 hertz (R5), as measured by IOS. Results: A total of 235 participants were analyzed, 184 (78.2%) had positive test results with R5, while 81 (34.4%) had positive MCT results with FEV1.The sensitivity and specificity of MCT with R5were 87.3%, 64.6%, and MCT with FEV1 were 39.1%, 85.4%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was greater at lower doses of MCT at R5, (AUROC: 0.653; p= 0.01). Conclusion: The results showed higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and earlier response of the short protocol of MCT with IOS, compared to MCT with spirometry. Our study suggested the utility of IOS in addition to conventional spirometry as a method of choice in MCT for detection of AHR.

Abstract

Yetişkinlerde hava yolu aşırı duyarlılığının tespiti için metakolin provokasyon testinde spirometri ve impuls osilometrinin karşılaştırılması Giriş: Hava yolu hiperreaktivitesi (HHR) astımın karakteristik bir özelliğidir. Bu çalışmada amaç, bronşiyal astımı düşündüren klinik olarak HHR olan ve başlangıç spirometresi normal olan bireylerde, HHR tespiti için impuls osilometri (IOS) ve metakolin provokasyon testlerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmaya HHR'yi düşündüren semptomları olan ve normal başlangıç spirometri testi olan yetişkinler seçildi. Metakolin provokasyon testinin (MPT) kısa protokolü, eş zamanlı olarak IOS ve spirometri kullanılarak tüm hastalara uygulandı. Birincil son nokta, bir saniyede zorlu ekspiratuar hacimde %20'lik bir düşüşe (FEV1) neden olan metakolin dozunu, IOS ile ölçülen bazal solunum rezistansını gibi 5 hertz'de (R5) %40 artıran metakolin dozajıyla karşılaştırmaktı. Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 235 hasta değerlendirildi. Hastaların 184'ü (%78,2) R5 ile pozitif test sonuçlarına sahipken, 81'i (%34,4) FEV1 ile pozitif MPT sonuçlarına sahipti. MPT'nin R5 ile duyarlılığı ve özgüllüğü sırasıyla %87,3,%64,6 ve FEV1 ile MPT %39,1, %85,4 idi. ROC analizinde eğri altında kalan alan, R5'te daha düşük MPT dozlarında daha büyüktü (AUROC: 0,653; p= 0,01). Sonuç: Sonuçlar, spirometri ile MPT'ye kıyasla, IOS ile MPT'nin kısa protokolünün daha yüksek duyarlılığı, daha yüksek negatif prediktif değeri ve daha erken yanıtı olduğunu gösterdi. Çalışmamızın, HHR'nin saptanması için MPT'de tercih edilen bir yöntem olarak geleneksel spirometriye ek olarak IOS'un kullanımını önermektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAZEMIYAH, M., ANSARIN, K., NOURIVASKEH, M., SADEGI, T., SHARIFI, A. (2021). Comparison of spirometry and impulse oscillometry in methacholine challenge test for the detection of airway hyperresponsiveness in adults. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/414130

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Comberiati P, Katial RK, Covar RA. Bronchoprovocation testing in asthma: an update. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2018; 38(4): 545-71
  2. Horak F, Doberer D, Eber E, Horak E, Pohl W, Riedler J, et al. Diagnosis and management of asthma - statement on the 2015 GINA Guidelines. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 128(15-16): 541-54
  3. Chapman DG, Irvin CG. Mechanisms of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: the past, present and yet to come. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 45(4): 706-19
  4. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161(1): 309-29
  5. Coates AL, Wanger J, Cockcroft DW, Culver BH, Diamant Z, Gauvreau G, et al. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J 2017; 49(5): 1601526
  6. Schwartz N, Grossman A, Levy Y, Schwarz Y. Correlation between eosinophil count and methacholine challenge test in asymptomatic subjects. J Asthma 2012; 49(4): 336- 41
  7. Hoen AG, Li J, Moulton LA, O'Toole GA, Housman ML, Koestler DC, et al. Associations between Gut microbial colonization in early life and respiratory outcomes in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 2015; 167(1): 138-47
  8. Arikoglu T, Unlu A, Yildirim DD, Kuyucu S. The airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine may be predicted by impulse oscillometry and plethysmography in children with well-controlled asthma. J Asthma 2018; 55(11): 1166-73
  9. Broeders ME, Molema J, Hop WC, Folgering HT. Bronchial challenge, assessed with forced expiratory manoeuvres and airway impedance. Respir Med 2005; 99(8): 1046- 52
  10. Kalliola S, Malmberg LP, Kajosaari M, Mattila PS, Pelkonen AS, Makela MJ. Assessing direct and indirect airway hyperresponsiveness in children using impulse oscillometry. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113(2): 166-72
  11. Brashier B, Salvi S. Measuring lung function using sound waves: role of the forced oscillation technique and impulse oscillometry system. Breathe (Sheff) 2015; 11(1): 57-65
  12. Mansur AH, Manney S, Ayres JG. Methacholine-induced asthma symptoms correlate with impulse oscillometry but not spirometry. Respir Med 2008; 102(1): 42-9
  13. Komarow HD, Skinner J, Young M, Gaskins D, Nelson C, Gergen PJ, et al. A study of the use of impulse oscillometry in the evaluation of