Dergiler / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

The Evaluation of Effi cacy of Intravitreal Afl ibercept and Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Zone I Retinopathy of Prematurity

Sayfa
347–353
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, requiring additional treatment due to recurrence at high rates is a disadvantage of these therapies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who received intravitreal afl ibercept (IVA) or intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) due to zone I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: In this study, the data of patients who received IVA or IVB due to aggressive posterior ROP (APROP) or type 1 ROP in zone I were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, requiring additional treatment due to recurrence at high rates is a disadvantage of these therapies.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who received intravitreal afl ibercept (IVA) or intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) due to zone I retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Materials and Methods: In this study, the data of patients who received IVA or IVB due to aggressive posterior ROP (APROP) or type 1 ROP in zone I were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ birth weights (BW), gestational age (GA), postmenstrual age during treatment (PMA), regression and recurrence rates, and additional treatments were recorded. Results: The study included 33 patients who were treated due to APROP or type 1 ROP in zone I. The IVA group with 22 eyes of 11 patients (Group 1) and the IVB group with 42 eyes 22 patients (Group 2). The mean BW of the patients were 932.7±330 grams and 1117.0±578 grams (p=0.07) and the mean GA values were 26.6±2.3 weeks and 28±3.5 weeks (p=0.83) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The follow-up duration was 16.5±2.3 months and 8.0±2.6 months in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p=0.000). The PMA at treatment was applied was 33.5 weeks in Group 1 and 34.2 weeks in Group 2 (p=0.146). Regression rate after initial treatment was 100% in Group 1 and 88.0% in Group 2 (p=0.046). The rate of additional treatment due to recurrence was 27.2% and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.537). Conclusion: ROP in zone I can be successfully treated with IVA and IVB. However, requiring additional treatment due to recurrence at high rates is a disadvantage of these therapies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKİNCİ, D. Y., OKUR, N. (2021). The Evaluation of Effi cacy of Intravitreal Afl ibercept and Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Zone I Retinopathy of Prematurity. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 347–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/413566

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Pedersen P, Bilsteen JF. Outcomes and follow-up programmes in extreme preterm children in Denmark in the EPICE/SHIPS cohort. Dan Med J 2020; 67: A08190472
  2. Rysavy MA, Horbar JD, Bell EF, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network and Vermont Oxford Network. Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174: e196294
  3. Taner A, Tekle S, Hothorn T, et al. Higher incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in extremely preterm infants associated with improved survival rates. Acta Paediatr 2020 Jan 28. doi: 10.1111/apa.15197
  4. Tavassoli S, Wach R, Haynes R, et al. Estimate of incidence of ROP requiring treatment in extreme preterms and impact on service-7 year review in tertiary unit. Eye (Lond) 2019; 33: 845-849
  5. Soh Y, Fujino T, Hatsukawa Y. Progression and timing of treatment of zone I retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 369–374 6. Sen P, Abraham S, Jain S, et al. Treatment outcomes of zone 1 retinopathy of prematurity: A study from a tertiary eye care center in South India. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2019; 9: 255-261
  6. Mintz-Hittner HA, Kuffel RR. Intravıtreal Injectıon Of Bevacızumab (Avastın) For Treatment Of Stage 3 Retınopathy Of Prematurıty In Zone I or Posterıor Zone II. Retina 2008; 28: 831-838
  7. Fukushimaa Y, Fujinob T, Kusakac S, et al. Favorable outcomes of adequate laser photocoagulation and salvage bevacizumab treatment for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports 2018; 11: 66-71
  8. Kychenthal A, Dorta P, Katz X. Zone I Retınopathy Of Prematurıty. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. Retina 2006; 7: 11-5
  9. Patel SN, Klufas MA. Evidence to date: ranibizumab and its potential in the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity. Eye Brain 2019; 11: 25-35
  10. Ekinci DY, Çelik K. Comparison of the Effi cacy Between Intravitreal Afl ibercept and Laser Photocoagulation in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2020; 57: 54-60
  11. Sukgen EA, Koçluk Y. Comparison of clinical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and afl ibercept treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 49-55
  12. Vural A, Perente İ, Onur İU, et al. Effi cacy of intravitreal afl ibercept monotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity evaluated by periodic fl uor