There are many explanations about this topic including complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors such as poor judgment or impulsive behavior in social settings, genetic susceptibility such as DRD2 genes, comorbid conduct disorder, and antisocial disorder (1,2).
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Substance use disorder (SUD) is more common in the attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) group than in the non-ADHD group.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Substance use disorder (SUD) is more common in the attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) group than in the non-ADHD group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There are many explanations about this topic including complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors such as poor judgment or impulsive behavior in social settings, genetic susceptibility such as DRD2 genes, comorbid conduct disorder, and antisocial disorder (1,2).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Özet
Substance use disorder (SUD) is more common in the attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) group than in the non-ADHD group. There are many explanations about this topic including complex interactions of genetic and environmental factors such as poor judgment or impulsive behavior in social settings, genetic susceptibility such as DRD2 genes, comorbid conduct disorder, and antisocial disorder (1,2).
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
TAHİROĞLU, A. Y., ÇELİK, G., AVCI, A., KARCI, C. K. (2021). Methylphenidate treatment in an analgesic dependent adolescent with ADHD. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 564–566. https://ajindex.com/articles/413384
Saad JF, Kohn MR, Clarke S, Lagopoulos J, Hermens DF. Is the Theta/Beta EEG Marker for ADHD Inherently Flawed? J Atten Disord. 2018 Jul;22(9):815-826
Gloss D, Varma JK, Pringsheim T, Nuwer MR. Practice advisory: The utility of EEG theta/beta power ratio in ADHD diagnosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016 Nov 29;87(22):2375-2379
Newson JJ, Thiagarajan TC. EEG Frequency Bands in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Resting State Studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;12:521
Widge AS, Bilge MT, Montana R, Chang W, Rodriguez CI, Deckersbach T, Carpenter LL, Kalin NH, Nemeroff CB. Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;176(1):44-56
Velasques B, Bittencourt J, Diniz C, Teixeira S, Basile LF, Inácio Salles J, Novis F, Angélica Silveira L, de Assis da Silva R, de Lima Teixeira A, Nardi AE, Akiskal HS, Cagy M, Piedade R, Cheniaux E, Kapczinki F, Ribeiro P. Changes in saccadic eye movement (SEM) and quantitative EEG parameter in bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2013 Mar 5;145(3):378-85
McVoy M, Lytle S, Fulchiero E, Aebi ME, Adeleye O, Sajatovic M. A systematic review of quantitative EEG as a possible biomarker in child psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Sep;279:331-344
Robar G. EEG in bipolar disorders - a literature review. Master thesis / Prosjektoppgave, 2006.
Schiller MJ. Quantitative Electroencephalography in Guiding Treatment of Major Depression. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 23;9:779.