Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy

Sayfa
51–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, the lack of need for expanded dissection (corporal separation, inferior pubectomy) reduces postoperative complication rates

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) is frequently seen after prostate surgery because of various operative and postoperative factors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and methods: Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction in our clinic between July 2017 and March 2019 were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, the lack of need for expanded dissection (corporal separation, inferior pubectomy) reduces postoperative complication rates
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis (VUAS) is frequently seen after prostate surgery because of various operative and postoperative factors. In this study, we aimed to present our results of perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction, which is a new technique of the perineal approach in the treatment of patients with VUAS after prostate cancer surgery. Material and methods: Sixteen consecutive patients who underwent perineoscopic bladder neck reconstruction in our clinic between July 2017 and March 2019 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, surgical history, postoperative continence status, and additional treatment requirements were recorded. Perineoscopic surgery is defined as the visualization of the surgical site with instruments used in laparoscopy and the surgeon performing the entire operative procedure through the screen. Results: The mean number of preoperative endoscopic bladder neck resections of the patients was 7±5.1, with a history of suprapubic cystostomy in 7 (43.7%) and radiotherapy in 5 (31.2%) patients before surgery. The mean surgical time was 126.2±13.1 min. The mean follow-up period was 13.2±6.8 months, and the success rate was 81.25%. During follow-up, two (12.5%) patients received perineoscopic re-do reconstruction because of stricture recurrence, and one (6.2%) patient was included in a urethral dilatation program. Conclusion: Improving visualization and ergonomics with the perineoscopic approach can increase the success rate of bladder neck reconstruction in comparison with the standard approach. In addition, the lack of need for expanded dissection (corporal separation, inferior pubectomy) reduces postoperative complication rates

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞİMŞEK, A., DANACIOĞLU, Y. O., ARIKAN, Y., YENİCE, M. G., ATAR, F. A., TAŞÇI, A. İ. (2021). Perineoscopic vesicourethral reconstruction: A novel surgical technique for anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 51–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/413267

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Lavollé A, de la Taille A, Chahwan C, Champy CM, Grinholtz D, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal robot-assisted vesicourethral reconstruction to manage anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. Urology 2019
  2. [Crossref] 2. Elliott SP, Meng MV, Elkin EP, McAninch JW, Duchane J, Carroll PR, et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data From CaPSURE. J Urol 2007
  3. [Crossref] 3. Abrams P, Khoury S, Grant A. Evidence-based medicine overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations. Prog Urol 2007
  4. [Crossref] 4. Muñoz D, Vicens A, García-Montes F. Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy with or without postoperative radiotherapy. Actas Urol Esp 2011
  5. [Crossref] 5. Metcalfe PD, Wang J, Jiao H, Huang Y, Hori K, Moore RB, et al. Bladder outlet obstruction: progression from inflammation to fibrosis. BJU Int 2010
  6. [Crossref] 6. LaBossiere JR, Cheung D, Rourke K. Endoscopic treatment of vesicourethral stenosis after radical prostatectomy: outcomes and predictors of success. J Urol 2016
  7. [Crossref] 7. Breyer BN, McAninch JW. Management of recalcitrant bladder neck contracture after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: endoscopic and open surgery. J Urol 2011
  8. [Crossref] 8. O'Leary DP, Deering-McCarthy E, McGrath D, Walsh D, Coffey JC. Identification of the optimal visual recording system in open abdominal surgery–a prospective observational study. J Vis Commun Med 2016
  9. [Crossref] 9. Taşçı Aİ, Şimşek A, Şam E, Şeker KG, Atar FA, Şahin S. Perineoscopic radical prostatectomy: A novel surgical technique for the treatment of prostate cancer. Turk J Urol 2020
  10. [Crossref] 10. Satava RM. Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2005
  11. [Crossref] 11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004
  12. [Crossref] 12. Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, Carmignani G. Two-stage transperineal management of posterior urethral strictures or bladder neck contractures associated with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery and endoscopic treatment failures. Eur Urol 2007
  13. [Crossref] 13. Tjiam IM, Goossens RH, Schout BM, Koldewijn EL, Hendrikx AJ, Muijtjens AM,