Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2021 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy

Sayfa
S1–S8
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Long-term data and functional outcome after RARC and ICUD are needed to further validate the role of RARC in the management of bladder cancer.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been gaining momentum as an alternative to its conventional open radical cystectomy (ORC) for the management of invasive bladder cancer.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although RARC, in general, demonstrated less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than ORC, whether there is any significant difference in the overall complication rate still requires further investigation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Long-term data and functional outcome after RARC and ICUD are needed to further validate the role of RARC in the management of bladder cancer.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been gaining momentum as an alternative to its conventional open radical cystectomy (ORC) for the management of invasive bladder cancer. Although RARC, in general, demonstrated less blood loss and shorter hospital stay than ORC, whether there is any significant difference in the overall complication rate still requires further investigation. Thus, both RARC and ORC share a similar oncology outcome, with comparable positive surgical margin rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Techniques of intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) have not yet been standardized. ICUD may result in a lower risk of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture than extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD). However, ECUD is still a valid and commonly practiced option according to the available data. In general, RARC has been demonstrated to provide promising results. Long-term data and functional outcome after RARC and ICUD are needed to further validate the role of RARC in the management of bladder cancer.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YEE, C. H., CHUN, J. Y., CHAN, E. S. Y. (2021). Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, S1–S8. https://ajindex.com/articles/413256

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Dy GW, Gore JL, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Fitzmaurice C. Global Burden of Urologic Cancers, 1990-2013. Eur Urol 2017
  2. [Crossref] 2. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009
  3. [Crossref] 3. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Pfeiffer C, Volkmer BG. Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. Eur Urol 2012
  4. [Crossref] 4. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute--lessons to be learned. J Urol 2006
  5. [Crossref] 5. Tang K, Li H, Xia D, Hu Z, Zhuang Q, Liu J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. PLoS One 2014
  6. e95667. [Crossref] 6. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, El-Tabey NA, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003
  7. [Crossref] 7. Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, Bentas W, Probst M, Blaheta R, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intraabdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2003
  8. [Crossref] 8. Peng L, Li J, Cao D, Ren Z, Wei T, You C, et al. Can robotic-assisted radical cystectomy provide patients with a smaller trauma and faster recovery period? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020
  9. [Crossref] 9. Albisinni S, Veccia A, Aoun F, Diamand R, Esperto F, Porpiglia F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of open and robotic assisted radical cystectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2019
  10. [Crossref] 10. Satkunasivam R, Tallman CT, Taylor JM, Miles BJ, Klaassen Z, Wallis CJD. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Oncologic, Perioperative, and Complication-related outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol 2019
  11. [Crossref] 11. Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, Adshead J, Lane T, Ahmed K, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019
  12. CD011903. [Crossref] 12. Iwata T, Kimura S, Foerster B, Fossati N, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Onc