Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2022 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Pelvicalyceal System of the Kidney Based on Native CT Images Are 1-Step Away from the Use of Contrast Agents

Sayfa
130–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Described semi-autonomous approach allows for 3-dimensional reconstruction of dilated pelvi- calyceal system based on non-contrast computed tomography images

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To describe special algorithm for the semi-autonomous 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvicalyceal system based on native computed tomography images of patients with upper urinary tract obstruction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All patients underwent computed tomography urography to perform 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvicalyceal system on the affected size based on excretory phase representing “gold standard” and on native phase, which was performed via Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit program updated with the described algorithm.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Described semi-autonomous approach allows for 3-dimensional reconstruction of dilated pelvi- calyceal system based on non-contrast computed tomography images
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To describe special algorithm for the semi-autonomous 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvicalyceal system based on native computed tomography images of patients with upper urinary tract obstruction. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with renal colic fitting to inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients underwent computed tomography urography to perform 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvicalyceal system on the affected size based on excretory phase representing “gold standard” and on native phase, which was performed via Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit program updated with the described algorithm. Five urologists estimated their similarities and the potential use of non-contrast models for interventional planning. Contralateral non-distended pelvicalyceal system was reconstructed to evaluate the viability of the proposed technology in such cases. Surface areas of contrast and non-contrast models were compared. Distended pel- vicalyceal system of 1 patient was used to reconstruct virtual endoscopic view. Obtained 3-dimensional non- contrast pelvicalyceal system models were analyzed by an engineer for suitability for 3-dimensional printing. Results: The average surface area of contrast and non-contrast models was 3513 and 3371 mm2 , respec- tively (P = .0818). Non-contrast 3-dimensional reconstruction was possible with all distended pelvicalyceal systems and with 9 non-distended cases. Properties of non-contrast models were estimated as 4.3 out of 5. Obtained models were suitable for their intraluminal reconstruction and potential 3-dimensional printing. Conclusion: Described semi-autonomous approach allows for 3-dimensional reconstruction of dilated pelvi- calyceal system based on non-contrast computed tomography images

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GULİEV, B., TALYSHİNSKİİ, A., AKBAROV, I., CHUKANOV, V., VASİLYEV, P. (2022). Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Pelvicalyceal System of the Kidney Based on Native CT Images Are 1-Step Away from the Use of Contrast Agents. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 130–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/413245

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD. An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol. 2016
  2. 13(11):654-662. [CrossRe. Atalay HA, Canat HL, Ülker V, Alkan İ, Özkuvanci Ü, Altun- rende F. Impact of personalized three-dimensional (3D) printed pelvicalyceal system models on patient information in percutane- ous nephrolithotripsy surgery: a pilot study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017
  3. 43(3):470-475. [CrossRef] 3. Gadzhiev N, Brovkin S, Grigoryev V, Tagirov N, Korol V, Petrov S. Sculpturing in urology, or how to make percutaneous nephroli- thotomy easier. J Endourol. 2015
  4. 29(5):512-517. [CrossRef] 4. Talyshinskii A, Guliev B, Komyakov B, Galfano A. Patient coun- seling through the pelvicalyceal-shaped labyrinth in search of an easy understanding of the upcoming stone removal: a pilot study. Urology. 2020
  5. Brix G, Lechel U, Nekolla E, Griebel J, Becker C. Radiation pro- tection issues in dynamic contrast-enhanced (perfusion) computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2015
  6. 84(12):2347-2358. [CrossRef] 6. Rudnick MR, Leonberg-Yoo AK, Litt HI, Cohen RM, Hilton S, Reese PP. The Controversy of contrast-induced nephropathy With intravenous contrast: what is the risk? Am J Kidney Dis. 2020
  7. 75(1):105-113. [CrossRef] 7. Sung JM, Jefferson FA, Tapiero S, et al. Evaluation of a diuresis enhanced noncontrast computed tomography for kidney stones protocol to maximize collecting system distention. J Endourol. 2020
  8. 34(3):255-261. [CrossRef] 8. Karim SS, Hanna L, Geraghty R, Somani BK. Role of pelvical- yceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature. Urolithiasis. 2020
  9. 48(3):263-270. [CrossRef] 9. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016
  10. 69(3):475-482. [CrossRef] 10. Zhu W, Xiong S, Xu C, et al. Initial experiences with preoperative three-dimensional image reconstruction technology in laparo- scopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Transl Androl Urol. 2021
  11. 10(11):4142-4151. [CrossRef] 11. Brehmer M, Beckman MO, Magnusson A. Three-dimensional computed tomography planning improves percutaneous stone sur- gery. Scand J Urol. 2014
  12. 48(3):316-323. [CrossRef] 12. Tan H, Xie Y, Zhang X, Wang W, Yuan H, Lin C. Assessment of three-dimensional reconstruction in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi treatment. Front Surg. 2021
  13. 8(8):701207. [CrossRef] 13. Shahzad R, Bos D, Budde RP, et