Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2022 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

The Study of 3D Printing-Assisted Electrospinning Technology in Producing Tissue Regeneration Polymer-Fibroin Scaffold for Ureter Repair

Sayfa
118–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This new form of 3-dimensional electrospinning constructed polycaprolactone–silk fibroin nanofiber scaffold may be considered as a clinical urinary tract tissue reconstruction alternative in the future.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Long segment ureteral lesion with obstruction is a clinically difficult issue for recovering and maintaining organ or tissue function.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We developed this customized scaffold using electrospinning and 3-dimensional assistance and expected that it may provide an alternative biomaterial for ureter defect repair.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This new form of 3-dimensional electrospinning constructed polycaprolactone–silk fibroin nanofiber scaffold may be considered as a clinical urinary tract tissue reconstruction alternative in the future.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Long segment ureteral lesion with obstruction is a clinically difficult issue for recovering and maintaining organ or tissue function. Regeneration medicine using various biomaterials as a scaffold in supporting tissue regrowth is emerging. We developed this customized scaffold using electrospinning and 3-dimensional assistance and expected that it may provide an alternative biomaterial for ureter defect repair. Material and Methods: Our study synthesized polycaprolactone and silk fibroin combination as biomate- rial scaffolds. The differences in physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of polycaprolactone–silk fibroin bio-scaffolds prepared by electrospinning alone and 3-dimensional printing combined with electro- spinning in proper ratios were compared and characterized. SV-HUC-1 uroepithelial cells cultured in poly- caprolactone–silk fibroin (4 : 6) scaffolds were observed under a scanning electron microscope and using calcein-acetomethoxy and propidium iodide stain. The ex vivo resected healthy human ureteral segment tissue was anastomosed with the polycaprolactone–silk fibroin scaffolds and cultured in an ex vivo bath for 2 weeks. The cellular growth on the polycaprolactone–silk fibroin scaffold was observed microscopically. In the New Zealand white rabbit model, we performed a 1/5 ratio (2 cm out of 10 cm) defect replacement of the unilateral ureter. After 7 weeks, the rabbits were sacrificed and the implanted ureter scaffolds were resected for tissue sectioning and the cellular growth was observed by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson staining. Results: When the proportion of silk fibroin was increased and the 3-dimensional electrospinning method was used, both the size and diameter of nanofiber holes were increased in the polycaprolactone–silk fibroin scaffold. Scanning electron microscope and fluorescent stain revealed that cultured 3T3 and SV-HUC-1 uro- epithelial cells could electively penetrate inside the polycaprolactone–silk fibroin (4 : 6) nanofibrous scaf- folds in 3 days. The polycaprolactone–silk fibroin scaffold anastomosis in an ex vivo bath showed cellular growth stably along the scaffold for 2 weeks, and most of the cells grow along with the outboard of the scaf- fold in layers. In an animal model, different layered cells can be observed to grow along with the outboard of the scaffold with mucosa, submucosa, muscular layer, and the serosa layer order after 7 weeks. Mucosa and muscular layer growth along the scaffold inner wall were seen simultaneously. Conclusion: 3-dimensional electrospinning synthesized 4 : 6 polycaprolactone–silk fibroin nanofiber scaf- folds that are feasible for tissue growth and achieve the purpose of ureteral reconstruction in animal experi- ments. This new form of 3-dimensional electrospinning constructed polycaprolactone–silk fibroin nanofiber scaffold may be considered as a clinical urinary tract tissue reconstruction alternative in the future.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HU, H., WU, C., HUANG, C., BAİ, M., YU, D. (2022). The Study of 3D Printing-Assisted Electrospinning Technology in Producing Tissue Regeneration Polymer-Fibroin Scaffold for Ureter Repair. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 118–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/413244

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Ma B, Xie J, Jiang J, Shuler FD, Bartlett DE. Rational design of nanofiber scaffolds for orthopedic tissue repair and regeneration. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013;8(9):1459-1481. [CrossRef] 2. Valizadeh A, Mussa Farkhani S. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014;8(2):83-92. [CrossRef] 3. Sankar S, Sharma CS, Rath SN, et al. Electrospun nanofibers to mimic natural hierarchical structure of tissues: application in mus culoskeletal regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12: 604-619. 4. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, Wang CH, Fuh JYH. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;132:296-332. [CrossRef] 5. Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, Wang X, Lovett ML, Kaplan DL. Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(10):1612-1631. [CrossRef] 6. Roy T, Maity PP, Rameshbabu AP, et al. Core-shell nanofibrous scaffold based on polycaprolactone-silk fibroin emulsion electro- spinning for tissue engineering applications. Bioengineering (Basel). 2018;5(3):5-68. [CrossRef] 7. Wang X. Advanced polymers for three-Dimensional (3D) organ bioprinting. Micromachines. 2019;10(12):814-818. [CrossRef] 8. Bishop ES, Mostafa S, Pakvasa M, et al. 3-D bioprinting technolo- gies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: current and future trends. Genes Dis. 2017;4(4):185-195. [CrossRef] 9. Elsayed Y, Lekakou C, Labeed F, et al. Fabrication and characteri- zation of biomimetic, electrospun gelatin fiber scaffolds for tunica media-equivalent, tissue engineered vascular grafts. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;61:473-483. 10. Mironov SL, Ivannikov MV, Johansson M. From mitochondrial permeability transition pore to Ca2+−induced Ca2+ release. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(1):715-721. [CrossRef] 11. Gomez P 3rd, Gil ES, Lovett ML, et al. The effect of manipulation of silk scaffold fabrication parameters on matrix performance in a murine model of bladder augmentation. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30): 7562-7570. [CrossRef] 12. Casanellas I, García-Lizarribar A, Lagunas A, Samitier J. Produc- ing 3D biomimetic nanomaterials for musculoskeletal system regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:128. [CrossRef] 13. Baskin LS, Hayward SW, Young P, Cunha GR. Role of mesenchy- mal-epithelial interactions in normal bladder development. J Urol. 1996;156(5):1820-1827. [CrossRef] 14. Wu HY, Baskin LS, Liu W, Li YW, Hayward S, Cunha GR. Under- standing bladder regeneration: smooth muscle ontogeny. J Urol. 1999;162(