Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2022 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

MRI/US Fusion Transperineal Versus Transrectral Biopsy of Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Complication Rates, a Tertiary Medical Center Experience in the Middle East

Sayfa
98–105
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound transperineal fusion biopsy has similar detection rate of clinically significant cancer compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with less urinary tract infec- tion post biopsy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To report on the outcomes of transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging/ultra- sound fusion biopsy of the prostate including detection of clinically significant cancer and complications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and methods: Between May 2019 and June 2020, 145 patients with suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging underwent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy at our center.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound transperineal fusion biopsy has similar detection rate of clinically significant cancer compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with less urinary tract infec- tion post biopsy.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To report on the outcomes of transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging/ultra- sound fusion biopsy of the prostate including detection of clinically significant cancer and complications. This is the first and largest series in the Middle East. Material and methods: Between May 2019 and June 2020, 145 patients with suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging underwent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy at our center. Transperineal biopsy was performed under light sedation, while transrectal biopsy patients had a peripros- tatic block for anesthesia. Clinically significant cancer was defined as Gleason ≥3 + 4 Results: In all, 98 transperineal biopsies and 47 transrectal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsies were done. Patients had similar prebiopsy parameters (transperineal vs. transrectal): median age (64.5 vs. 66 years; P = .68), median prostate-specific antigen value (7.5 vs. 7.5; P = .42), and median prostate volume (51 vs. 52.5; P = .83). Those that underwent transperineal biopsy had fewer average total number of cores compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (11 vs. 13; P = .025) fewer average num- ber of random cores (3 vs. 6; P < .0001), and the detection rate of clinically significant cancer was similar between the groups (44% vs. 48.9%; P = .57). No difference in hematuria, retention, and sepsis rate requiring admission (1 vs. 2; P = .2) was observed. However, more patients had urinary tract infection in the transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy group compared to transperineal biopsy group (5 vs. 1; P = .006) that were treated with antibiotics on outside basis. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound transperineal fusion biopsy has similar detection rate of clinically significant cancer compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy with less urinary tract infec- tion post biopsy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EL-ACHKAR, A., HEİDAR, N. A., LABBAN, M., AL-MOUSSAWY, M., MOUKADDEM, H., NASR, R., KHAULİ, R., EL-HAJJ, A., BULBUL, M. (2022). MRI/US Fusion Transperineal Versus Transrectral Biopsy of Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Complication Rates, a Tertiary Medical Center Experience in the Middle East. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 98–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/413242

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. . Hilton WM, Padalecki SS, Ankerst DP, Leach RJ, Thompson IM. Temporal changes in the clinical approach to diagnosing prostate can- cer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012
  2. 2012(45):162-168. [CrossRef] 2. Liu W, Patil D, Howard DH, et al. Adoption of Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging for men undergoing prostate biopsy in the United States. Urology. 2018
  3. [CrossRe 3. Anastasiadis E, van der Meulen J, Emberton M. Hospital admis- sions after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a database analysis in Eng- land. Int J Urol. 2015
  4. 22(2):181-186. [CrossRef] 4. Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM. Complica- tions after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol. 2011
  5. 186(5):1830-1834. [CrossRef] 5. Otrock ZK, Oghlakian GO, Salamoun MM, Haddad M, Bizri AR. Incidence of urinary tract infection following transrectal ultra- sound guided prostate biopsy at a tertiary-care medical center in Lebanon. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004
  6. 25(10):873-877. [CrossRef] 6. Gross MD, Alshak MN, Shoag JE, et al. Healthcare costs of post- prostate biopsy sepsis. Urology. 2019
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M. Transperineal Versus tran- srectal MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy: detection rate of clini- cally significant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017
  8. 15(1):e33-e36. [CrossRef] 8. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate can- cer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019
  9. 17(1):31. [CrossRef] 9. Tewes S, Peters I, Tiemeyer A, et al. Evaluation of MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy using transrectal and transperineal approaches. BioMed Res Int. 2017
  10. 2176471. [CrossRef] 10. Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, et al. Complications after system- atic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2017
  11. 71(3):353-365. [CrossRef] 11. Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, et al. Transperineal prostate biop- sies using local anesthesia: experience with 1,287 patients. Pros- tate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. J Urol. 2019
  12. 201(6):1121-1126. [CrossRef] 12. Ristau BT, Allaway M, Cendo D, et al. Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy provides acceptable cancer detection and mini- mizes risk of infection: evolving experience with a 10-sector tem- plate. Urol Oncol. 2018
  13. 36(12):528.e15-528.e20. [CrossRef] 13. Pepe P, Aragona F.