Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

The Outcome of Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Study

Akut Myeloid Lösemili Hastalarda Posakonazol ile Antifungal Profilaksi Sonuçları: Tek Merkez Çalışması

Sayfa
277–282
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Posaconazole treatment wasdiscontinued within 7-14 days in 7/84 patients (8.3%) due to poororal compliance related to mucositis after chemotherapy.Conclusion: Posaconazole appears to be effective and well-toleratedprotection against IFIs for AML patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant causeof morbidity and mortality among neutropenic patients undergoingchemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and stem celltransplantation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 34 patients in the control group did not receiveprimary antifungal prophylaxis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Posaconazole treatment wasdiscontinued within 7-14 days in 7/84 patients (8.3%) due to poororal compliance related to mucositis after chemotherapy.Conclusion: Posaconazole appears to be effective and well-toleratedprotection against IFIs for AML patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant causeof morbidity and mortality among neutropenic patients undergoingchemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and stem celltransplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-lifeimpact of posaconazole prophylaxis.Materials and Methods: Eighty-four adult patients were includedwith AML under remission induction chemotherapy and posaconazoleprophylaxis. The 34 patients in the control group did not receiveprimary antifungal prophylaxis. The period between June 2006 andJanuary 2009, when antifungal prophylaxis was not administered(control group), was retrospectively compared to the period betweenDecember 2010 and May 2012 when primary oral posaconazoleprophylaxis was administered in similar conditions (posaconazolegroup) according to the use of antifungal agents for treatment,breakthrough infections, galactomannan performance, and thenecessity for performing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedures.Results: The two groups were compared according to the use ofantifungal agents; progression to a different antifungal agent wasfound in 34/34 patients (100%) in the control group and in 9/84patients (11%) in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). There were fourbreakthrough IFIs (4/84, 4.8%) in the posaconazole group and 34 IFIsin the control group (p<0.001). In addition, 15/34 patients (44%) inthe control group required BAL compared to 11/84 patients (13%)in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). Posaconazole treatment wasdiscontinued within 7-14 days in 7/84 patients (8.3%) due to poororal compliance related to mucositis after chemotherapy.Conclusion: Posaconazole appears to be effective and well-toleratedprotection against IFIs for AML patients.

Abstract

Amaç: İnvaziv fungal enfeksiyonlar (İFE) akut myeloid lösemili (AML) ve kök hücre nakli yapılan hastalarda önemli bir mortalite ve morbidite nedenidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı posakonazol profilaksisinin gerçek yaşamdaki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: AML ve remisyon indüksiyon kemoterapisi alan ve posakonazol profilaksisi uygulanan 84 erişkin hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kontrol grubunda primer antifungal profilaksi almayan 34 hasta dahil edildi. Haziran 2006 ile Ocak 2009 tarihleri arası primer oral posakonazol profilaksisi almayan (kontrol grubu) ile Aralık 2010 ile Mayıs 2012 arası primer oral posakonazol profilaksisi (posakonazol grubu) uygulanan hastaları geriye dönük olarak; tedavi için antifungal ajan kullanımı, tedavi altında (breakthrough) enfeksiyonlar, galaktomannan performansı ve bronko-alveolar lavaj (BAL) gerekliliği gibi benzer durumlar için karşılaştırdık. Bulgular: İki grup antifungal ajan kullanımına göre karşılaştırıldığında farklı antifungal ajana geçiş kontrol grubunda 34/34 (%100) idi ve posakonazol grubunda bu oran 9/84 (%11) bulundu (p<0,001). Posakonazol grubunda 4 tedavi altında (breakthrough) IFE (4/84, %4,8) ve kontrol grubunda ise 34 İFE vardı (p<0,001). İlaveten kontrol grubunda BAL gereken hasta 15/34 (%44) iken, posakonazol grubunda BAL gerekliliği 11/84 (%13) bulundu (p<0,001). Posakonazol tedavisi hastaların 7/84’ünde (%8,3) kemoterapi sonrası mukozite bağlı oral alım bozukluğu nedeniyle 7-14 gün içinde kesilmişti. Sonuç: Posakonazol AML’li hastaların invaziv fungal enfeksiyonlarına karşı korumada etkili ve iyi tolere ediliyor görünmektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZKOCAMAN, V., ÖZKALEMKAŞ, F., SEYHAN, S., ENER, B., URSAVAŞ, A., ERSAL, T., KAZAK, E., DEMİRDÖĞEN, E., MISTIK, R., AKALIN, E. H. (2018). The Outcome of Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Study. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 277–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/412421

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Xu SX, Shen JL, Tang XF, Feng B. Newer antifungal for fungal infection prevention during hematopoietic cell transplantation: a meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 2013;45:407-414.
  2. Gomes MZ, Mulanovich VE, Jiang Y, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Incidence density of invasive fungal infections during primary antifungal prophylaxis in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in a tertiary cancer center, 2009-2011. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:865-873.
  3. Pagano L, Caira M, Cuence-Estrella M. The management of febrile neutropenia in the posaconazole era: a new challenge? Haematologica 2012;97:963-965.
  4. Girmenia C, Frustaci AM, Gentile G, Minotti C, Cartoni C, Capria S, Trisolini SM, Matturro A, Loglisci G, Latagliata R, Breccia M, Meloni G, Alimena G, Foa R, Micozzi A. Posaconazole prophylaxis during front-line chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center, real-life experience. Haematologica 2012;97:560-567.
  5. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiechi J, Stockelberg D, Goh YT, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med 2007;356:348-359.
  6. Ullman AJ, Lipton JH, Vesole DH, Chandrasekar P, Langston A, Tarantolo SR, Greinix H, Morais de Azenodo W, Reddy V, Boparai N, Pedicone L, Patino H, Durrant S. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graftversus-host disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:335-347.
  7. Tissot F, Agrawal S, Pagano L, Petrikkos G, Groll AH, Skiada A, Lass-Flörl C, Calandra T, Viscoli C, Herbrecht R. ECIL-6 guidelines for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, aspergillosis and mucormycosis in leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Haematologica 2017;102:433-444.
  8. Clark NM, Grim SA, Lynch JP 3rd. Posaconazole: Use in the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2015;36:767-785.
  9. Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:327-360.
  10. Meerseman W, Lagrou K, Maertens J, Wilmer A, Hermans G, Vanderschueren S, Spriet I, Verbeken E, Van Wijngaerden E. Galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a tool for diagnosing aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients. A