Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2021 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3

The comparison and diagnostic accuracy of different types of thermometers

Sayfa
434–442
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Future studies are warranted to expose the optimum way of measuring body temperature in children

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Fever is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions in children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of new methods of measuring body temperature and to compare the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of these methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Future studies are warranted to expose the optimum way of measuring body temperature in children
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background. Fever is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions in children. Although there are many ways to measure body temperature, the optimal method and the anatomic site are still controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of new methods of measuring body temperature and to compare the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of these methods. Methods. The body temperatures of the patients who were hospitalized as inpatients or who presented to the emergency room as outpatients between November 2014- March 2015 were measured and recorded. Mercury and digital axillary measurements, tympanic, temporal artery and non-contact skin temperatures were measured. Measurements were compared with each other. Results. According to our results temperature tends to increase over time for up to 8 minutes after placement when using axillary thermometers. Non-contact skin thermometers should be used only for follow-up of patients with fever, because of their low sensitivity and low negative predictivity. At the first examination, tympanic thermometers and axillary thermometers may be preferable for the diagnosis of fever. Conclusions. According to our results, using non-contact thermometers seems feasible and logical during the follow-up ofpatients with fever, but not in cases whose exact body temperature should be known. For the first examination of the patient to diagnose fever, tympanic thermometers and axillary thermometers may be preferable. Future studies are warranted to expose the optimum way of measuring body temperature in children

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDEM, N., DEMİRDAĞ, T. B., TEZER, H., YAYLA, B. C. C., TAPISIZ, A., AKSAKAL, F. N. B., DERİNÖZ, O., OKUR, A., PINARLI, F. G., KOÇAK, Ü., BİDECİ, A. (2021). The comparison and diagnostic accuracy of different types of thermometers. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 3, 434–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/412068

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. El-Radhi AS, Carroll J, Klein N. Clinical Manual of Fever in Children (1st ed) Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009
  2. MayA, Bauchner H.Fever phobia: the pediatrician’s contribution. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 851-854
  3. Nierman DM. Core temperature measurement in the intensive care unit. CritCare Med 1991; 19: 818-823
  4. Craig JV, Lancaster GA, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic review. BMJ 2000; 320: 1174-1178
  5. Powell KR. Chapter 174: Fever. Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics (18th ed) Philedelphia: Elsevier, 2007: 1084-1087
  6. Khorshid L, Eşer İ, Zaybak A, Yapucu U. Comparing mercury‐in‐glass, tympanic and disposable thermometers in measuring body temperature in healthy young people. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 496-500
  7. Gardner S. Axillary and rectal temperatures of full term neonates: are they different? Neonatal Netw 1987; 5: 42-43
  8. Chaturvedi D, Vilhekar KY, Chaturvedi P, Bharambe MS. Comparison of axillary temperature with rectal or oral temperature and determination of optimum placement time in children. Indian Pediatr 2004; 41: 600-603
  9. Erdal E, Eşer İ, Demir Ü ve ark.Oral ve aksiller yolla beden sıcaklığı ölçümünde termometrelerin bekletilme sürelerinin incelenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi 1991; 7: 23-28
  10. Greyling G, Viljoen MJ, Joubert G. Axillary temperature compared to tympanic membrane temperature in children. Curationis 2000; 23: 54-61
  11. Latman NS, Hans P, Nicholson L, DeLee Zint S, Lewis K, Shirey A. Evaluation of clinical thermometers for accuracy and reliability. Biomed Instrum Technol 2001; 35: 259-265
  12. Batra P, Goyal S. Comparison of rectal, axillary, tympanic, and temporal artery thermometry in the pediatric emergency room. Pediatric Emerg Care 2013; 29: 63-66
  13. Işler A, Aydin R, Tutar Güven Ş, Günay S. Comparison of temporal artery to mercury and digital temperature measurement in pediatrics. Int Emerg Nurs 2014; 22: 165-168
  14. Siberry GK, Diener-West M, Schappell E, Karron RA. Comparison of temple temperatures with rectal temperatures in children under two years of age. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002; 41: 405-414
  15. Hoffman RJ, Etwaru K, Dreisinger N, Khokhar A, Husk G. Comparison of temporal artery thermometry and rectal thermometry in febrile pediatric emergency department patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29: 301-304
  16. Greenes DS, Fleisher GR. Accurac