Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of i-gel, LMA-supreme, LMA-classic and LMAproseal as conduits of endotracheal intubation in newborns and infants: A manikin study

Sayfa
166–173
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion; the choice of i-gel as a conduit for intubationcould be safer than LMA-classic, LMA-supreme and LMA-proseal.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Many types of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) including the traditionalLMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) are commonly used as conduits for intubationin pediatric patients with difficult airway.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubationwith uncuffed, cuffed and armored uncuffed endotracheal tubes (ETT) sizedbetween 2.5 and 4.5 through four commonly used types of size 1 and 1.5SADs (i-gel, LMA-classic, LMA-supreme, LMA-proseal) were performed bytwo investigators on an infant manikin.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion; the choice of i-gel as a conduit for intubationcould be safer than LMA-classic, LMA-supreme and LMA-proseal.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Many types of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) including the traditionalLMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) are commonly used as conduits for intubationin pediatric patients with difficult airway. The aim of this study was toevaluate the feasibility of four types of commonly used neonatal and infantsized SADs as conduits of intubation. Fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubationwith uncuffed, cuffed and armored uncuffed endotracheal tubes (ETT) sizedbetween 2.5 and 4.5 through four commonly used types of size 1 and 1.5SADs (i-gel, LMA-classic, LMA-supreme, LMA-proseal) were performed bytwo investigators on an infant manikin. The investigators scored two mainoutcomes with a 5-point scale: 1) passage of ETT during intubation throughthe SAD, and 2) passage of SAD over the ETT during SAD removal. Thedifferences between the study groups were evaluated using the Bonferroniadjusted Mann-Whitney U test and p<0.0083 was considered as statisticallysignificant according to Bonferroni correction. i-gel sizes 1 and 1.5 bothperformed better as conduits for fiberoptic-guided intubation compared withLMA-proseal, LMA-classic and LMA-supreme with most of the uncuffed ETTsinvestigated (p<0.0083). We found i-gel sizes 1 and 1.5 easily feasible to useeven with uncuffed ETTs with an inner diameter of 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm,respectively. i-gel was the only SAD that was feasible for use as a conduit forarmored ETTs. The passage of cuffed ETTs was problematic with all types ofstudied SADs. In conclusion; the choice of i-gel as a conduit for intubationcould be safer than LMA-classic, LMA-supreme and LMA-proseal.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILBAŞ, A. A., BAŞARAN, B., ÜZÜMCÜGİL, F., AKÇA, B., İZGİ, M., CANBAY, Ö. (2019). Comparison of i-gel, LMA-supreme, LMA-classic and LMAproseal as conduits of endotracheal intubation in newborns and infants: A manikin study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 166–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/412043

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Sunder RA, Haile DT, Farrell PT, Sharma A. Pediatric airway management: current practices and future directions. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 1008-1015
  2. Black AE, Flynn PE, Smith HL, Thomas ML, Wilkinson KA; Association of Pediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Development of a guideline for the management of the unanticipated difficult airway in pediatric practice. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25: 346-362
  3. Jagannathan N, Kozlowski RJ, Sohn LE, et al. A clinical evaluation of the intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in children. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 176-182
  4. Jagannathan N, Ramsey MA, White MC, Sohn L. An update on newer pediatric supraglottic airways with recommendations for clinical use. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25: 334-345
  5. Khan RM, Sharma PK, Kaul N. Laryngeal mask airwayaided fiberoptic tracheal intubation in infant--a modified technique. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19: 1131-1132
  6. Weiss M, Goldmann K. Caution when using cuffed tracheal tubes for fibreoptic intubation through paediatric-sized laryngeal mask airways. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 523
  7. Xue FS, Luo MP, Liao X, Tang GZ. Measures to facilitate the classic laryngeal mask airway guided fiberoptic intubation in children with a difficult airway. Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18: 1273-1275
  8. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kotarlic M, Theiler L, Greif R. Limitations of pediatric supraglottic airway devices as conduits for intubation – an in vitro study. Can J Anaesth 2018; 65: 14-22
  9. Burjek NE, Nishisaki A, Fiadjoe JE, et al; PeDI Collaborative Investigators. Videolaryngoscopy versus fiber-optic intubation through a supraglottic airway in children with a difficult airway: an analysis from the multicenter pediatric difficult intubation registry. Anesthesiology 2017; 127: 432-440
  10. Sohn LE, Jagannathan N, Sequera-Ramos L, Sawardekar A, Schaldenbrand K, De Oliveira GS. A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-QTM assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 723-728
  11. Jagannathan N, Sohn L, Ramsey M, et al. A randomized comparison between the i-gel™ and the air-Q™ supraglottic airways when used by anesthesiology trainees as conduits for tracheal intubation in children. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62: 587-594
  12. Lee JR, Kim MS, Kim JT, et al. A randomised trial comparing the i-gelTM with the LMA ClassicTM in children. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 606-611
  13. Fukuhara A, Okutani R, Oda Y. A randomized comparison of the i-gel