Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Comparison between the motor function of school-aged children with normal birth weight and children with low birth weight: a cross-sectional study

Sayfa
374–385
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is proposed thatmore diagnostic evaluations be conducted on LBW infants for all aspects ofdevelopment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Low birth weight (LBW) children are prone to abnormal neurological signsin tone, coordination and reflexes, due to neonatal complications which leadto development of motor deficits and delays.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study was conductedwith 471 school-aged children from different districts of West Bengal, India.Different socio-demographic variables of the participants were studied byusing a pre-structured schedule questionnaire.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is proposed thatmore diagnostic evaluations be conducted on LBW infants for all aspects ofdevelopment.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Low birth weight (LBW) children are prone to abnormal neurological signsin tone, coordination and reflexes, due to neonatal complications which leadto development of motor deficits and delays. The aim of the present studywas a comparison between the motor function of school-age children withnormal birth weight (NBW) and children with LBW. This study was conductedwith 471 school-aged children from different districts of West Bengal, India.Different socio-demographic variables of the participants were studied byusing a pre-structured schedule questionnaire. Gross motor function wasstudied by standing broad jump and vertical jump whereas fine motor functionwas studied by hand reaction time and speed of movement. Jumping skill wasbetter among the boys than girls which implied that the gross motor skillof boys was better than girls. However, the hand reaction time and speed ofmovement among the girls was better than that of boys which implied that thefine motor skill of girls was better than boys. The postnatal growth of LBWchildren was significantly lower than that of NBW children. Both gross andfine motor performances of LBW children were significantly poorer than thatof NBW children. This study found a strong association between birth weightand motor skills among school-age children even after controlling for theeffects of age, gestational age, postnatal growth (height, weight and BMI) andsocioeconomic status in a multivariable model. Thus, it appears that babieswho are born with LBW have a tendency of neuro-developmental impairmentsduring their childhood. Therefore, long-term monitoring programs and earlydetection and intervention is necessary in order to minimize future sequelae.The finding of this study indicates the importance of paying special attentionto developmental follow up of high risk and LBW infants. It is proposed thatmore diagnostic evaluations be conducted on LBW infants for all aspects ofdevelopment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PAL, A., MANNA, S., DHARA, P. C. (2019). Comparison between the motor function of school-aged children with normal birth weight and children with low birth weight: a cross-sectional study. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 374–385. https://ajindex.com/articles/411993

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005; 365: 891-990
  2. Central Statistical Agency (Ethiopia) and ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and Macro 2006. Available at: https:// unicef.org/ethiopia/DHS_2005_Ethiopia. pdf 3. Gebremedhin M, Ambaw F, Admassu E, Berhane H. Maternal associated factors of low birth weight: A hospital based cross-sectional mixed study in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 222
  3. Dalal A, Chauhan S, Bala DV. Epidemiological determinants of low birth weight in Ahmedabad city: A facility based case-control study. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2014; 3: 430-432
  4. Balanda KP, McAvoy HA. Unequal at birth: Inequalities in the occurrence of low birthweight babies in Ireland. The Institute of Public Health in Ireland, 2006
  5. Samsom JF, de Groot L, Bezemer PD, Lafeber HN, Fetter WP. Muscle power development during the first year of life predicts neuromotor behaviour at 7 years in preterm born high-risk infants. Early Hum Dev 2002; 68: 103-118
  6. Nazi S, Aliabadi F. Comparison of motor development of low birth weight (LBW) infants with and without using mechanical ventilation and normal birth weight infants. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2015; 29: 301
  7. Venetsanou F, Kamba A. The effects of age and gender on balance skills in preschool children. Phys Educ Sport 2011; 9: 81-90
  8. Willems TM, Witvrouw E, Delbaere K, Philippaerts R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Clercq D. Intrinsic risk factors for inversion ankle sprains in females-a prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005; 15: 336-345
  9. Oswalt A. Early childhood physical development: Gross and fine motor development 2016. Available at: https://gulfbend.org/poc/view_doc. php?type=doc&id=12755& cn=5 11. Benelli C, Yongue B. Supporting young children’s motor skill development. Child Educ 1995; 71: 217- 220
  10. Lenke MC. Motor outcomes in premature infants. Newborn Inf Nurs Rev 2003; 3: 104-109
  11. Makrides M, Anderson A, Gibson RA, Collins CT. Improving the neurodevelopmental outcomes of low birth weight infants. In: Bhatia J, Bhutta ZA, Kalhan SC (eds): Maternal and Child Nutrition: The First 1000 Days. Nestlé Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. Nestec Ltd, Vevey/S. Karger AG, Basel 2013; 74: 211-221
  12. Alshaikh B, Yusuf K, Sauve R. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birth weight infant