Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 4

Awareness assessment for parents of children with congenital heart diseases regarding fetal echocardiography

Sayfa
569–577
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Data on fetal echocardiography should be clarified at the initial diagnosis of pediatric CHD.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background and objectives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The high recurrence rate of congenital heart disease (CHD) in siblings was the rationale for recommending fetal echocardiography.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Data on fetal echocardiography should be clarified at the initial diagnosis of pediatric CHD.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background and objectives. The high recurrence rate of congenital heart disease (CHD) in siblings was the rationale for recommending fetal echocardiography. However, in a developing country like Egypt, there are limited fetal echocardiographic examinations under this category. The study was conducted to assess knowledge about fetal echocardiography amongst parents of children with CHD. Method. A questionnaire survey was conducted in a tertiary pediatric hospital from June to December 2018. The study included parents having children with CHD follow up in the outpatient clinic or admitted in the pediatric cardiology ward. The questionnaire included demographic data of parents regarding sex, age, education, and residence. It also includes a detailed inquiry about parents’ knowledge regarding the availability, safety, and value of fetal echocardiography. Results. Participants were 200 parents, mostly mothers 159 (79.5%). The median age of parents included in the study was 33.5 (29-40) years. Regarding awareness, 134 (67%) did not know any prenatal diagnostic investigation for CHD, 46 (23%) knew fetal echocardiography, and 20 (10%) named other tools. Nevertheless, 34% of parents thought they would need fetal echocardiography in a subsequent pregnancy. Although 178 (89%) of parents thought it might be a safe investigation, 33% did not think it will have additional benefits over postnatal echocardiography. The age of the patient and age of the participating parent were the only statistically significant predictors for parents knowledge on fetal echocardiography existence with p= 0.008, 95% CI=1.039- 1.282 and p= 0.015, 95% CI = 0.864-0.984, respectively. Conclusion. Parents of children with CHD have significant knowledge gaps regarding Fetal Echocardiography. Our findings suggest that the current parent counseling is inadequate and needs further focus, especially in developing countries, to promote parents’ understanding of the prenatal cardiac diagnosis. Data on fetal echocardiography should be clarified at the initial diagnosis of pediatric CHD.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RAKHA, S. (2020). Awareness assessment for parents of children with congenital heart diseases regarding fetal echocardiography. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 4, 569–577. https://ajindex.com/articles/411969

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Hoffman J, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1890-1900. 2. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2241-2247
  2. Ozkutlu S, Akça T, Kafali G, Beksaç S. The results of fetal echocardiography in a tertiary center and comparison of low-and high-risk pregnancies for fetal congenital heart defects. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2010; 10: 263-269
  3. Clur SA, Van Brussel PM, Ottenkamp J, Bilardo CM. Prenatal diagnosis of cardiac defects: accuracy and benefit. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 450-455
  4. Zhang YF, Zeng XL, Zhao EF, Lu HW. Diagnostic value of fetal echocardiography for congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e1759
  5. Mirza FG, Bauer ST, Williams IA, Simpson LL. Early echocardiography: ready for prime time. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29: 313-318
  6. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001; 103: 1269-1273
  7. Hoffman JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: I. postnatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol 1995; 16: 103- 113
  8. Burn J, Brennan P, Little J, et al. Recurrence risks in offspring of adults with major heart defects: results from fist cohort of British collaborative study. Lancet 1998; 351: 311-316
  9. Nora JJ, Nora AH. Genetic epidemiology of congenital heart diseases. Prog Med Genet 1983; 5: 91-137
  10. Gill HK, Splitt M, Sharland GK, Simpson JM. Patterns of recurrence of congenital heart disease: an analysis of 6,640 consecutive pregnancies evaluated by detailed fetal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 923-929
  11. Fesslova V, Brankovic J, Lalatta F, et al. Recurrence of congenital heart disease in cases with familial risk screened prenatally by echocardiography. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 368067
  12. Pierpont ME, Basson CT, Benson DW Jr, et al; American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Genetic basis for congenital heart defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation 2007; 115: 3015-3038
  13. Hinton RB Jr, Martin LJ, Tabangin ME, Mazwi ML, C