Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2021 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4

Health insurance status and outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sayfa
539–553
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Strategies aimed at identifying causality and reducing disparities are warranted.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The impacts of health insurance status on survival outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged 0-39 years) with malignant tumors have not been addressed in depth.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The present study aimed to identify significant relationships of health insurance condition with overall survival or all-cause mortality among children (age 0–14 years) and adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15–39 years) with malignant tumors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Strategies aimed at identifying causality and reducing disparities are warranted.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background. The impacts of health insurance status on survival outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged 0-39 years) with malignant tumors have not been addressed in depth. The present study aimed to identify significant relationships of health insurance condition with overall survival or all-cause mortality among children (age 0–14 years) and adolescents and young adults (AYAs, age 15–39 years) with malignant tumors. Methods. PubMed, Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Econlit, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, PsychInfo, Business Source Premier, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Database, and SCOPUS were systematically searched from inception to February 29, 2020 with no language restriction. All related articles comparing the effect of health insurance status on the risk of overall survival and the risk of all-cause mortality in malignant conditions affecting children and AYAs were identified. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using a random- or fixed-effect model as per the heterogeneity evaluated using Cochran’s Q and I2 statistics. Results. Fourteen studies including 149,680 individuals were selected for this meta-analysis. The pooled RR for all-cause mortality with insurance versus without insurance was 0.78 (95%CI, 0.71–0.86; I2=33.7%). Among the insurance types, patients with private insurance presented with a lower all-cause mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60–0.82), with considerable heterogeneity (I2=83.3%). Conclusions. The findings of this review suggest that a lack of or insufficient insurance is related to all-cause mortality of AYAs with malignant cancers. Strategies aimed at identifying causality and reducing disparities are warranted.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HUANG, C., LİU, H., HU, H., JİA, L., HU, S. (2021). Health insurance status and outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4, 539–553. https://ajindex.com/articles/411748

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Pritchard-Jones K, Pieters R, Reaman GH, et al. Sustaining innovation and improvement in the treatment of childhood cancer: lessons from highincome countries. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: e95-e103
  2. Bleyer A. The adolescent and young adult gap in cancer care and outcome. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2005; 35: 182-217
  3. Global Burden of Disease Child and Adolescent Health Collaboration, Kassebaum N, Kyu HH, Zoeckler L,, et al.Child and adolescent health from 1990 to 2015: findings from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors 2015 Study. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171: 573-592
  4. Patton GC, Coffey C, Sawyer SM, et al. Global patterns of mortality in young people: a systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2009; 374: 881-892
  5. Abdul-Razak S, Azzopardi PS, Patton GC, Mokdad AH, Sawyer SM. Child and adolescent mortality across Malaysia’s epidemiological transition: a systematic analysis of global burden of disease data. J Adolesc Health 2017; 61: 424-433
  6. Heron M. Deaths: leading causes for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62: 1-96
  7. Sidebotham P, Fraser J, Fleming P, Ward-Platt M, Hain R. Patterns of child death in England and wales. Lancet 2014; 384: 904-914
  8. Bleyer A, Ferrari A, Whelan J, Barr RD. Global assessment of cancer incidence and survival in adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64
  9. Mogensen H, Modig K, Tettamanti G, Erdmann F, Heyman M, Feychting M. Survival after childhood cancer-social inequalities in high-income countries. Front Oncol 2018; 8: 485
  10. Stones DK, De Bruin GP, Esterhuizen TM, Stefan DC. Childhood cancer survival rates in two South African units. S Afr Med J 2014; 104: 501-504
  11. Keegan TH, Grogan RH, Parsons HM, et al. Sociodemographic disparities in differentiated thyroid cancer survival among adolescents and young adults in California. Thyroid 2015; 25: 635- 648
  12. James SL, Castle CD, Dingels ZV, et al. Global injury morbidity and mortality from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Inj Prev 2020; 26(Suppl 1): i165
  13. Aizer AA, Falit B, Mendu ML, et al. Cancer-specific outcomes among young adults without health insurance. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2025-2030
  14. Keegan TH, DeRouen MC, Parsons HM, et al. Impact of treatment and insurance on socioeconomic disparities in survival after adolescent and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25: 264-273
  15. Fintel AE, Jamy O, Mar