Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Classification of UAV point clouds by random forest machine learning algorithm

Sayfa
51–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lastly, the overall accuracy of the classification was achieved as 96% and the Kappa index was reached to 91% on data set.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Today, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based images have become an important data sources for researchers who deals with mapping from various disciplines on photogrammetry and remote sensing.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Reconstruction of an area with three-dimensional (3D) point clouds from UAV-based images are an essential process to be used for traditional 2D cadastral maps or to produce a topographic maps.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lastly, the overall accuracy of the classification was achieved as 96% and the Kappa index was reached to 91% on data set.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Unmanned aerial vehicle · Point cloud · Classification

Abstract

Today, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based images have become an important data sources for researchers who deals with mapping from various disciplines on photogrammetry and remote sensing. Reconstruction of an area with three-dimensional (3D) point clouds from UAV-based images are an essential process to be used for traditional 2D cadastral maps or to produce a topographic maps. Point clouds should be classified since they subjected to various analyses for extraction for further information from direct point cloud data. Due to the high density of point clouds, data processing and gathering information makes the classification of point clouds a challenging task and may take a long time. Therefore, the classification processing allows an optimal solution to acquire valuable information. In this study, random forest machine learning algorithm for classification processing is applied with radiometric features (Red band, Green band and Blue band) and geometric characteristics derived from covariance feature (curvature, omnivariance, flatness, linearity, surface variance, anisotropy and normalized terrain surface) of points. In addition, the case study is presented in order to test applicability of the proposed methodology to acquire an accuracy and performance of random forest method on the UAV based point cloud. After the classification processing, a class assigned each point from the model was compared with the reference data class. Lastly, the overall accuracy of the classification was achieved as 96% and the Kappa index was reached to 91% on data set.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZEYBEK, M. (2021). Classification of UAV point clouds by random forest machine learning algorithm. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 51–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/411607

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Akar Ö & Güngör O (2012). Classification of multispectral images using Random Forest algorithm. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation, 1(2), 105-112. DOI: 10.9733/jgg.241212.1 Akgül M, Yurtseven H, Demir M, Akay A E, Gülci S & Öztürk T (2016). Usage opportunities of generating digital elevation model with unmanned aerial vehicles on forestry. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 66(1), 104-118 DOI:10.17099/jffiu.23976 (in Turkish) Arya S, Mount D, Kemp S E & Jefferis G (2019). RANN: Fast nearest neighbour search (wraps ANN library) using l2 metric. R package version 2.6, 1. Retrieved from: https://rdrr.io/cran/RANN/
  2. ASPRS (2019). LAS Specification 1.4 - R14. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Retrieved from http://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/LAS_1_4_r14.pdf
  3. Bivand R S, Pebesma E & Gomez-Rubio V (2008). Applied spatial data analysis with R. ISBN: 978-1-4614-7618-4,
  4. Springer, New York. Blomley R, Weinmann M, Leitloff J & Jutzi B (2014). Shape distribution features for point cloud analysis - A geometric histogram approach on multiple scales. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3, 9-16. DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-3-9-2014
  5. Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
  6. Chen B, Shi S, Gong W, Zhang Q, Yang J, Du L, Sun J, Zhang Z & Song S (2017). Multispectral liDAR point cloud classification: A two-Step approach. Remote Sensing, 9(4), 373. DOI: 10.3390/rs9040373 CloudCompare. (2013). Telecom ParisTech (version 2.4) [GPL software]. EDF R&D. Retrieved from http://www.danielgm.net/cc/
  7. Cutler D R, Edwards Jr T C, Beard K H, Cutler A, Hess K T, Gibson J & Lawler J J (2007). Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 88(11), 2783-2792. DOI:10.1890/07-0539.1 Çetinkaya B & Toz G (2007). Usage of error matrix in the accuracy assessment of geographic data selection results. İTÜDERGİSİ/d, 6(5-6), 59-68. (in Turkish) Çömert R, Matci D K & Avdan, U. (2019). Object based burned area mapping with random forest algorithm. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(2), 78-87. DOI:10.26833/ijeg.455595 de Almeida C T, Galvao L S, Aragao L E D E, Ometto J P H B, Jacon A D, Pereira F R D, et al. (2019). Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral data for aboveground biomass modeling in the Brazilian Amazon using different regression algorithms. Remote Sensing of Environment, 232. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111323 Demir N (2015). Various methods to dete