KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6

Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Jae Hyun KİM
Won MOON
Seun Ja PARK
Moo In PARK
Sung Eun KİM
Ki Hwan KU
Gyu Won LEE
Youn Jung CHOİ
Sayfa
657–660
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Only one lesion exhibited lymphatic invasion.Conclusion: EUS may not be essential for diagnosis and treatment planning for rectal NETs less than 10 mm in size.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is helpful for evaluating the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical impact of EUS for rectal NETs less than 10 mm in diameter.Materials and Methods: : A total of 76 rectal NETs treated at our hospital between June 2006 and March 2013 were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Only one lesion exhibited lymphatic invasion.Conclusion: EUS may not be essential for diagnosis and treatment planning for rectal NETs less than 10 mm in size.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is helpful for evaluating the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical impact of EUS for rectal NETs less than 10 mm in diameter.Materials and Methods: : A total of 76 rectal NETs treated at our hospital between June 2006 and March 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. All lesions were analyzed with EUS to evaluate the depth of tumor invasion. The lesions were resected by endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation (ESMR-L) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and examined histologically.Results: Endoscopic ultrasonography findings showed that all lesions were confined to the submucosa and revealed no adjacent lymph node metastasis. Seventy-five of the 76 lesions were completely resected by ESMR-L. One lesion was resected by ESD and the resected deep margin of the lesion was histologically positive. Only one lesion exhibited lymphatic invasion.Conclusion: EUS may not be essential for diagnosis and treatment planning for rectal NETs less than 10 mm in size.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KİM, J. H., MOON, W., PARK, S. J., PARK, M. I., KİM, S. E., KU, K. H., LEE, G. W., CHOİ, Y. J. (2014). Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6, 657–660. https://ajindex.com/articles/410761

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003; 97: 934-59
  2. Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract. Cancer 2005; 103: 1587-95
  3. Cho MY, Kim JM, Sohn JH, et al. Current trends of the incidence and pathological diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in Korea 2000-2009: Multicenter Study. Cancer Res Treat 2012; 44: 157-65
  4. Fahy BN, Tang LH, Klimstra D, et al. Carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRS): A strategy for preoperative outcome assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 396-404
  5. Koura AN, Giacco GG, Curley SA, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Ellis LM. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Cancer 1997; 79: 1294-8
  6. Kobayashi K, Katsumata T, Yoshizawa S, et al. Indications of endoscopic polypectomy for rectal carcinoid tumors and clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 285-91
  7. Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Iizuka H, Sohara N, Mori M, Itoh H. Endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 169-76
  8. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3063-72
  9. Bates HR Jr. Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: A statistical review. Dis Colon Rectum 1966; 9: 90
  10. Naunheim KS, Zeitels J, Kaplan EL, et al. Rectal carcinoid tumors- -treatment and prognosis. Surgery 1983; 94: 670-6
  11. Kang JH, Chae HS, Cho JW, et al. A small rectal carcinoid tumor with liver metastasis. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 21: 802-6
  12. Baik DS, Lee JH, Lee SI, et al. A small rectal carcinoid tumor with multiple liver metastases. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 34: 233-8
  13. Lee SH, Park SJ, Kim HH, et al. Endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparision of polypectomy and endoscopic submucosal resection with band ligation. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 89-94
  14. Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim HW, et al. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 432-6
  15. Jetmore AB, Ray JE, Gathright JB Jr, McMullen KM, Hicks TC, Timmcke AE. Rectal carcinoids: The most frequent carcinoid tumor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 717-25
  16. Yamagishi D, Matsubara N, Noda M, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of rectal carcinoid patients underg