Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5

Jae Hyuck Chang1, Tae Ho Kim1, Chang Whan Kim1, In Seok Lee2, Sok Won Han1

Sayfa
518–523
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

EPLBD more than 10 mm and smaller CBD diameter were related to less recurrence of CBD stones.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Some common bile duct (CBD) stones recur after endoscopic stone extraction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Little information is available on the size and recurrence interval of recurrent symptomatic CBD stones or on ways to prevent recurrence.Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2011, consecutive 481 patients undergoing endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at a single institute were enrolled.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:EPLBD more than 10 mm and smaller CBD diameter were related to less recurrence of CBD stones.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Some common bile duct (CBD) stones recur after endoscopic stone extraction. Little information is available on the size and recurrence interval of recurrent symptomatic CBD stones or on ways to prevent recurrence.Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2011, consecutive 481 patients undergoing endoscopic extraction of CBD stones at a single institute were enrolled. We selected 34 patients with recurrent symptomatic CBD stones and 63 patients who were followed up more than five years without recurrence. Results: The sizes of the CBD stones increased during the recurrences: 10.1±5.2 mm, 13.5±7.3 mm, and 16.8±7.8 mm at the initial presentation, the first recurrence, and the second recurrence, respectively (p=0.016). Among CBD stone recurrences, 50% occurred within 2.3 years, and 80% occurred within 5.3 years. The recurrence group had a smaller proportion of patients under 50 years of age, larger CBD diameters, less histories of more than 10 mm endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD), and more type I periampullary diverticula, compared with the non-recurrence group (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that EPLBD more than 10 mm and smaller CBD diameter were independently related to less recurrence of CBD stones (p=0.001 and 0.012, respectively).Conclusion: The sizes of CBD stones increased during recurrences. EPLBD more than 10 mm and smaller CBD diameter were related to less recurrence of CBD stones.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CHANG, J. H., KİM1, T. H., KİM, C. W., LEE, I. S., HAN, S. W. (2014). Jae Hyuck Chang1, Tae Ho Kim1, Chang Whan Kim1, In Seok Lee2, Sok Won Han1. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5, 518–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/410756

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endo- scopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-18.
  2. Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, et al. BDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Koreailiary symptoms and compli- cations more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 894-9.
  3. Hawes RH, Cotton PB, Vallon AG. Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 1008-12.
  4. Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, et al. Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 457-64.
  5. Cheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors for stone re- currence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 461-4.
  6. Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are dif- ficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 156-9.
  7. Harada R, Maguchi H, Takahashi K, et al. Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones prevents short-term recurrence in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 498-503.
  8. Ha DW, Song GA, Kim DU, et al. [Recurrent common bile duct stone and endoscopic treatment after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation with minor endoscopic sphincterotomy]. Ko- rean J Gastroenterol 2011; 57: 352-7.
  9. Keizman D, Ish Shalom M, Konikoff FM. Recurrent symptomatic common bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction in elderly patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 60-5.
  10. Oak JH, Paik CN, Chung WC, Lee KM, Yang JM. Risk factors for re- currence of symptomatic common bile duct stones after chole- cystectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 417821. Kim DI, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastro- intest Endosc 2001; 54: 42-8.
  11. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zşñiga V, Añaños F, Domènech E, Morillas RM, Gassull MA. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Lapa- rosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006; 16: 208-11.
  12. Keizman D, Shalom MI, Koniko