Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Where are we?

Sayfa
298–303
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Especially, patient age should be taken into consideration in predicting hepatic encephalopathy risk.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical/hemodynamic success, complications, and biochemical/ hematologic consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with 10-mm bare stents in our patients.Materials and Methods: Data of 27 cirrhotic patients (18 men and 9 women; mean age, 39.7±18.7 years) with a median MELD score 14 treated with TIPS between January 2000 and August 2010 were evaluated retrospectively.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The indications were refractory bleeding varices in 48.2%, refractory ascites in 22.2%, and Budd-Chiari syndrome in 29.6% of the patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Especially, patient age should be taken into consideration in predicting hepatic encephalopathy risk.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical/hemodynamic success, complications, and biochemical/ hematologic consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) created with 10-mm bare stents in our patients.Materials and Methods: Data of 27 cirrhotic patients (18 men and 9 women; mean age, 39.7±18.7 years) with a median MELD score 14 treated with TIPS between January 2000 and August 2010 were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The indications were refractory bleeding varices in 48.2%, refractory ascites in 22.2%, and Budd-Chiari syndrome in 29.6% of the patients. Technical and hemodynamic success rates were 96.3% and 92.3%, respectively. Mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 21.5±5.3 mm Hg to 9±2.7 mm Hg (p<0.05). The rate of primary stent patency was 76.9% 1 year after the procedure. No statistically significant difference in shunt dysfunction was found between the groups of patients treated for Budd-Chiari syndrome and other indications (p>0.05). One patient (3.7%) had shunt dysfunction due to thrombosis within 24 hours. New and/or worsening hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 34.6% of patients. Increased age (>=40 years) was significantly related to hepatic encephalopathy in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p<0.05). Thirty-day mortality rate and 1-year transplant-free survival rate were 0% and 80.7%, respectively.Conclusion: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure is a safe treatment for many patients with cirrhosis, but post-procedure hepatic encephalopathy and shunt dysfunction are still problems. Especially, patient age should be taken into consideration in predicting hepatic encephalopathy risk.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTUN, R., YILDIRIM, A. E., OCAL, S., AKBAŞ, E., HARMAN, A., KORKMAZ, M., SELÇUK, H. (2014). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Where are we?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 298–303. https://ajindex.com/articles/410269

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Shah VH, Kamath PS. Portal hypertension and gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, ed. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 9th ed. Philadel- phia: Saunders
  2. p.1489-516. [CrossRef] Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ. The role of transjugular intrahepatic porto- systemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension. Hepatology 2005
  3. [CrossRef] Gines P, Angelli P, Lenz K, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritoni- tis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2010
  4. [CrossRef] Vangelli M, Patch D, Burrougs AK. Salvage TIPS for uncontrolled variceal bleeding. J Hepatol 2003
  5. [CrossRef] Sanyal A, Genning C, Reddy KR, et al. The North American study for the treatment of refractory ascites. Gastroenterology 2003
  6. [CrossRef] Perello A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Gilabert R, et al. TIPS is a useful long term derivative therapy for patients with Budd-Chiari syn- drome uncontrolled by medical therapy. Hepatology 2002
  7. [CrossRef] Garcia-Pagan JC, Heydtmann M, Raffa S, et al. TIPS for Budd-Chiari syndrome: Long term results and prognostics factors in 124 pa- tients. Gastroenterology 2008
  8. [CrossRef] Kamath PS, Kim WR. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). Hepatology 2007
  9. [CrossRef] Chalasani N, Clark WS, Martin LG, et al. Determinants of mortal- ity in patients with advanced cirrhosis after transjugular intra- hepatic portosystemic shunting. Gastroenterology 2000
  10. [CrossRef] Schepke M, Roth F, Fimmers R, et al. Comparison of MELD, Child- Pugh, and Emory Model for the prediction of survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting. Am J Gastroenterology 2003
  11. [CrossRef] Sanyal AJ, Freedman AM, Purdum PP, Shiffman ML, Luketic VA. The hematologic consequences of transjugular intrahepatic por- tosystemic shunts. Hepatology 1996
  12. [CrossRef] Rösch J, Hanafe W, Snow H, Barenfus M, Gray R. Transjugular intrahe- patic portocaval shunt. Am J Surgery 1971
  13. [CrossRef] Freedman AM, Sanyal AJ, Tisnado J, et al. Complications of tran- sjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a comprehensive re- view. Radiographics 1993
  14. [CrossRef] LaBerge JM, Ring EJ, Gordon RL, et al. Creation of transjugular intra- hepatic portosystemic shunts with the wallstent endoprosthesis: Results in 100 patients.