Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

The importance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in the diagnosis and clinical course of acute pancreatitis

Sayfa
342–347
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was also not significant correlation between mean SWV value and age, mean length of hospital stay, and mean amylase level.Conclusion: ARFI elastography may be a feasible method for the diagnosis of AP, but it has no value for the prediction of clinical course of AP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by acute inflammation of the pancreas and it has a highly variable clinical course.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: A total of 108 patients (age, 57±1.8 y) and 79 healthy subjects (age, 53.6±1.81 y) were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was also not significant correlation between mean SWV value and age, mean length of hospital stay, and mean amylase level.Conclusion: ARFI elastography may be a feasible method for the diagnosis of AP, but it has no value for the prediction of clinical course of AP.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterized by acute inflammation of the pancreas and it has a highly variable clinical course. The aim of our study was to evaluate the value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in the diagnosis and clinical course of AP.Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of AP (patients group) and healthy subject (control group) were prospec-tively enrolled to the study. Demographic features and clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were recorded. Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTQ) was used to implement ARFI elastography. The tissue elasticity is proportional to the square of the wave velocity (SWV). Results: A total of 108 patients (age, 57±1.8 y) and 79 healthy subjects (age, 53.6±1.81 y) were included in the study. There were 100 (92.5%) edematous and 8 (7.4%) necrotizing AP. The mean SWV was significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group (2.43±0.08 vs. 1.27±0.025 m/s, p<0.001). There was not significant difference between patient and control group regarding age and gender. SWV cutoff value of 1.63 m/s was associated with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity for the diagnosis of AP. There was not significant difference between patients with and without complications and patients with edematous and necrotizing AP regarding mean SWV value. There was also not significant correlation between mean SWV value and age, mean length of hospital stay, and mean amylase level.Conclusion: ARFI elastography may be a feasible method for the diagnosis of AP, but it has no value for the prediction of clinical course of AP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYA, M., DEĞİRMENCİ, S., GÖYA, C., TUNCEL, E. T., UÇMAK, F., KAPLAN, M. A. (2018). The importance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in the diagnosis and clinical course of acute pancreatitis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 342–347. https://ajindex.com/articles/410170

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Yokoe M, Takada T, Mayumi T, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Japanese guideline 2015. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015
  2. [CrossRef] 21. Nesvaderani M, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Acute pancreatitis update on management. Med J Aust 2015
  3. [CrossRef] 20. Appelros S, Borgström A. Incidence, aetiology and mortality rate of acute pancreatitis over 10 years in defined urban papolation in Sweden. Br J Surg 1999
  4. [CrossRef] 19. Frey CF, Zhou H, Harvey DJ, White RH. The incidence and case fatality rates of acute biliary, alcoholic, and idiopathic pancreatitis in California. 1994-2001. Pancreas 2006
  5. [CrossRef] 18. Raghuwanshi S, Gupta R, Vyas MM, Sharma R. CT evaluation of acute pancreatitis and its prognostic correlation with CT severity in-dex. J Clin Diagn Res 2016
  6. [CrossRef] 17. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pan-creatitis: value of CT in the establishing prognosis. Radiology 1990
  7. [CrossRef] 16. Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring system in the early prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012
  8. [CrossRef] 15. Spanier BW, Nio Y, van der Hulst RW, Tuynman HA, Dijkgraaf MG, Bruno MJ. Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 14. Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ. Pancre-atic fluid collection prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 1997
  10. [CrossRef] 13. Sternby B, O’Brien JF, Zinsmeister AR, DiMagno EP. What is the best biochemical test to diagnose acute pancreatitis? A prospective clinical study. Mayo Clin Proc 1996
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Murphy KP, O’Conner OJ, Maher MM. Updated imaging nomen-clature for acute pancreatitis. Am J Roentgenol 2014
  12. [CrossRef] 11. Kadiyala V, Suleiman SL, McNall-Baltar J, Wu BU, Banks PA, Singh VK. The Atlanta classification, revised Atlanta classification, and determinant-based classificiation of acute pancreatitis. Pan-creas 2016
  13. [CrossRef] 10. Göya C, Hamidi C, Hattapoğlu S, et al. Use of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography to diagnose acute pancreatitis at hospi-tal admission comparison with sonography and computed tomogra-phy. J Ultrasound Med 2014
  14. [CrossRef] 9. Xie J, Zou L, Yao M