Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Safety and effectiveness of midazolam for cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation

Sayfa
448–455
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Extreme caution should be taken when sedating patients with cirrhosis receiving EVL due to the AEs associated with the use of MDZ

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is an established treatment for esophageal variceal bleeding.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 325 patients with cirrhosis who received EVL.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Extreme caution should be taken when sedating patients with cirrhosis receiving EVL due to the AEs associated with the use of MDZ
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is an established treatment for esophageal variceal bleeding. Midazolam (MDZ) is most commonly used for sedation during endoscopic procedures. However, adverse events (AEs) may occur more frequently in patients with cirrhosis due to altered MDZ metabolism. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 325 patients with cirrhosis who received EVL. Results: No significant differences were found in treatment outcome and procedure time among 151 patients in the MDZ group and 169 patients in the non-MDZ group. Desaturation (23.2% vs. 7.7%, p<0.01), bradycardia (22.5% vs. 17.2%, p=0.03), and hepatic enceph-alopathy (HE) (6.6% vs. 0.6%, p<0.01) were more common in the MDZ group than in the non-MDZ group. Logistic regression analyses revealed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of ≥2 (p<0.01) and the use of MDZ (p<0.01) were associated with the development of overall AEs. An ECOG score of ≥2 (p=0.01), high serum creatinine level (p=0.02), and the use of MDZ (p<0.01) were significant risk factors for HE. Conclusion: Extreme caution should be taken when sedating patients with cirrhosis receiving EVL due to the AEs associated with the use of MDZ

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

JO, H. B., LEE, J. K., JANG, D. K., KANG, H. W., KİM, J. H., LIM, Y. J., KOH, M., LEE, J. H. (2018). Safety and effectiveness of midazolam for cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 448–455. https://ajindex.com/articles/410105

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Van Stiegmann G, Cambre T, Sun JH. A new endoscopic elastic band ligating device. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 230-3
  2. Van Stiegmann G, Sun JH, Hammond WS. Results of experimental endoscopic esophageal varix ligation. Am Surg 1988; 54: 105-8
  3. Van Stiegmann G, Goff JS. Endoscopic esophageal varix ligation: pre-liminary clinical experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 113-7
  4. Van Stiegmann G, Goff JS, Sun JH, Davis D, Bozdech J. Endoscopic variceal ligation: an alternative to sclerotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 431-4
  5. Daneshmend TK, Bell GD, Logan RF. Sedation for upper gastrointesti-nal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey. Gut 1991; 32: 12-5
  6. Lichtenstein DR, Jagannath S, Baron TH, et al. Sedation and anesthe-sia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 815-26
  7. Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967-74
  8. Keeffe EB. Sedation and analgesia for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 932-4
  9. Waring JP, Baron TH, Hirota WK, et al. Guidelines for conscious se-dation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 317-22
  10. Riphaus A, Wehrmann T, Weber B, et al. S3-guidelines--sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 1298-330
  11. Schafer DF, Jones EA. Hepatic encephalopathy and the gamma-am-inobutyric-acid neurotransmitter system. Lancet 1982; 1: 18-20
  12. Lavoie J, Layrargues GP, Butterworth RF. Increased densities of pe-ripheral-type benzodiazepine receptors in brain autopsy samples from cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology 1990; 11: 874-8
  13. Olasmaa M, Rothstein JD, Guidotti A, et al. Endogenous benzodiaz-epine receptor ligands in human and animal hepatic encephalopathy. J Neurochem 1990; 55: 2015-23
  14. Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 675-701. 15 Paquet KJ. Prophylactic endoscopic sclerosing treatment of the esophageal wall in varices - a prospective controlled randomized trial. Endoscopy 1982; 14: 4-5 16. Trey C, Davidson CS. The management of fulminant hepatic failure. Prog Liver Dis 1970; 3: 282-98
  15. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response crite-ria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 649-55. 18 Correia LM, Bonilha DQ, Gomes GF, et al. Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhoti