Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®)

Sayfa
67–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We therefore recommend discontinuing the use of PEG 3350 for bowel preparation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-3350, approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only for constipation, combined with 1.9 L of sports drink (SD) (Gatorade®) and bisacodyl (B) is commonly used in outpatient practice for bowel preparation due to cited patient satisfaction and tolerability of this specific regimen.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We aim to compare PEG-3350 (Miralax®) with PEG-AA-based (MoviPrep®) in terms of efficacy, patient satisfaction, and the effects of these two regimen on serum electrolytes.Materials and Methods: This study is a prospective, single-blinded, block randomized trial comparing single-dose PEG-3350+SD+B to split-dose 2-L PEG-AA in the outpatient endoscopy unit in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We therefore recommend discontinuing the use of PEG 3350 for bowel preparation.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-3350, approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only for constipation, combined with 1.9 L of sports drink (SD) (Gatorade®) and bisacodyl (B) is commonly used in outpatient practice for bowel preparation due to cited patient satisfaction and tolerability of this specific regimen. We aim to compare PEG-3350 (Miralax®) with PEG-AA-based (MoviPrep®) in terms of efficacy, patient satisfaction, and the effects of these two regimen on serum electrolytes.Materials and Methods: This study is a prospective, single-blinded, block randomized trial comparing single-dose PEG-3350+SD+B to split-dose 2-L PEG-AA in the outpatient endoscopy unit in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Basic metabolic profiles were checked on the day of randomization and on the day of procedure. Patients completed a survey on the day of procedure. Bowel preparation quality was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) by two endoscopists and a nurse present during the procedure. Results: We randomized 150 patients (74 PEG-3350+SD+B and 76 PEG-AA). The PEG-AA group had significantly higher BBPS scoresin the right colon by Endoscopist 1, Nurse, and Endoscopist 2 (p 0.005, <0.000, 0.001) and in the left and transverse colon by Nurse and Endoscopist 2 (p 0.004, 0.26, 0.000, 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction or change in serum electrolytes between the two groups.Conclusion: Use of single-dose PEG-3350+SD+B results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with split-dose PEG-AAand does not provide any advantage in regards to patient satisfaction. We therefore recommend discontinuing the use of PEG 3350 for bowel preparation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KHAN, M. A., PATEL, K. B., NOORUDDIN, M., SWANSON, G., FOGG, L., KESHAVARZIAN, A., BROWN, M. (2018). Polyethylene Glycol-3350 (Miralax®)+1.9-L sports drink (Gatorade®)+2 tablets of bisacodyl results in inferior bowel preparation for colonoscopy compared with Polyethylene Glycol-Ascorbic Acid (MoviPrep®). Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 67–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/410090

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonosco-py-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 18. Enestvedt BK, Brian Fennerty M, Zaman A, Eisen GM. MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011
  3. [CrossRef] 17. McKenna T, Macgill A, Porat G, Friedenberg FK. Colonoscopy preparation: polyethylene glycol with Gatorade is as safe and effica-cious as four liters of polyethylene glycol with balanced electrolytes. Dig Dis Sci 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 16. Samarasena JB, Muthusamy VR, Jamal MM. Split-dosed Mira-LAX/Gatorade is an effective, safe, and tolerable option for bowel preparation in low-risk patients: a randomized controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012
  5. [CrossRef] 15. Shieh FK, Gunaratnam N, Mohamud SO, Schoenfeld P. Mira-LAX-gatorade bowel prep versus GoLytely before screening colonos-copy: an endoscopic database study in a community hospital. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012
  6. [CrossRef] 14. Stratton S, Shelton P, Carleton V, Griglione GR. Feasibility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 (Miralax) for colon preparation pri-or to lower endoscopic examination in healthy adults
  7. experience in a community clinic setting. Am J Gastroenterol 2008
  8. [CrossRef] 13. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, et al. Randomized trial of low-vol-ume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008
  9. [CrossRef] 12. Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascor-bic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Al-iment Pharmacol Ther 2006
  10. [CrossRef] 11. DiPalma JA, Wolff BG, Meagher A, Cleveland Mv. Comparison of reduced volume versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing. Am J Gastroenterol 2003
  11. [CrossRef] 10. Enestvedt BK, Fennerty MB, Eisen GM. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tol-erability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011
  12. [CrossRef] 9. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, con-trolled assessment of factors influe