Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Endoscopic papillectomy of benign ampullary lesions: Outcomes from a multicenter study

Sayfa
325–334
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also allows for correct histological diagnosis and staging.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has emerged as an alternative to surgery in the management of ampullary lesions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of 44 patients who had EP of benign ampullary lesions.Results: Over the 11-year period, 44 (55.7%) of 79 patients underwent EP for benign ampullary lesions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also allows for correct histological diagnosis and staging.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has emerged as an alternative to surgery in the management of ampullary lesions. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility, efficacy, safety, outcome, and impact of EP in the management of benign ampullary lesions. Materials and Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of 44 patients who had EP of benign ampullary lesions.Results: Over the 11-year period, 44 (55.7%) of 79 patients underwent EP for benign ampullary lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 40 patients (91%). An underlying adenocarcinoma was the only risk factor for incomplete resection. Twenty-eight lesions (63.6%) were resected en-bloc and 16 lesions (36.4%) were resected in piecemeal fashion. Post-papillectomy histopathologic diagnoses were tubular adenoma in 14 patients (32%), invasive adenocarcinoma in 9 patients (20.5%), tubullovillous adenoma in 7 patients (16%), tubullovillous adenoma with carcinoma limited to the mucosal layer in 5 patients (11.3%), adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in 4 patients (9%), neuroendocrine tumor in 1 patient (2.3%), ganglioneuroma in 1 patient (2.3%), hamartomatous polyp in 1 patient (2.3%), adenofibroma in 1 patients (2.3%), and Brunner gland hyperplasia in 1 patient (2.3%). Seven (15.9%) procedure-related complications occurred: 3 (6.8%) bleeding, 2 (4.5%) pancreatitis, 1 (2.3%) abdominal pain, and 1 (2.3%) stent migration to the pancreatic duct. Seven patients (17%) had recurrence.Conclusion: Endoscopic papillectomy is a safe and effective method and can be considered as a first-line approach in patients with benign ampullary lesions with intent for cure. It also allows for correct histological diagnosis and staging.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATTİLA, T., PARLAK, E., ALPER, E., DİŞİBEYAZ, S., ÇİÇEK, B., ÖDEMİŞ, B. (2018). Endoscopic papillectomy of benign ampullary lesions: Outcomes from a multicenter study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 325–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/410060

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Napoleon B, Gincul R, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic papillecto-my for early ampullary tumors: long-term results from a large mul-ticenter prospective study. Endoscopy 2014
  2. [CrossRef] 37. Laleman W, Verreth A, Topal B, et al. Endoscopic resection of am-pullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 2013
  3. [CrossRef] 36. Salmi S, Ezzedine S, Vitton V, et al. Can papillary carcinomas be treated by endoscopic ampullectomy? Surg Endosc 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 35. Patel R, Davitte J, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic resec-tion of ampullary adenomas: complications and outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2011
  5. [CrossRef] 34. Jeanniard-Malet O, Caillol F, Pesenti C, Bories E, Monges G, Giovannini M. Short-term results of 42 endoscopic ampullecto-mies: a single-center experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011
  6. [CrossRef] 33. Yamao T, Isomoto H, Kohno S, et al. Endoscopic snare papillec-tomy with biliary and pancreatic stent placement for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Surg Endosc 2010
  7. [CrossRef] 32. Irani S, Arai A, Ayub K, et al. Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period. Gastrointest Endosc 2009
  8. [CrossRef] 31. Jung MK, Cho CM, Park SY, et al. Endoscopic resection of amp-ullary neoplasms: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2009
  9. [CrossRef] 30. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Moreno de Vega V, Domenech E, Gas-sull MA. Endoscopic resection of ampullary tumors: 12-year review of 21 cases. Surg Endosc 2009
  10. [CrossRef] 29. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. Safety and long-term follow-up of endoscopic snare excision of ampullary adeno-mas. Surg Endosc 2006
  11. [CrossRef] 28. Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endo-scopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005
  12. [CrossRef] 27. Bohnacker S, Seitz U, Nguyen D, et al. Endoscopic resection of benign tumors of the duodenal papilla without and with intraductal growth. Gastrointest Endosc 2005
  13. [CrossRef] 26. Han J, Lee SK, Park DH, et al. Treatment outcome after endo-scopic papillectomy of tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Korean J Gastroenterol 2005
  14. Moon JH, Cha SW, Cho YD, et al. Wire-guided endoscopic snare papillectomy f