Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of bowel preparation quality in patients with a history of colorectal resection

Sayfa
278–283
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, a longer time between colonoscopy and surgery was not related to unsuccessfulbowel cleansing.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that a history of colorectal surgery is not a risk factor for inadequate colon cleansing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Suboptimal bowel function can negatively affect colon cleansing for colonoscopy after surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We postulated that the coloncleansing quality in patients with a history of colorectal surgery might not be inferior to that of patients with no resection history.Materials and Methods: Overall, 200 patients were enrolled in the study and distributed into two groups: the resection group (RG) andthe control group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, a longer time between colonoscopy and surgery was not related to unsuccessfulbowel cleansing.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that a history of colorectal surgery is not a risk factor for inadequate colon cleansing.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Suboptimal bowel function can negatively affect colon cleansing for colonoscopy after surgery. Very few studieshave compared the relationship between the colorectal resection and the bowel preparation quality. We postulated that the coloncleansing quality in patients with a history of colorectal surgery might not be inferior to that of patients with no resection history.Materials and Methods: Overall, 200 patients were enrolled in the study and distributed into two groups: the resection group (RG) andthe control group. The surgical maneuvers were classified as right colectomy, left colectomy, and rectosigmoidectomy. The bowel preparation was performed using 2-L low-volume or 4-L high-volume regimens, and the preparation quality was evaluated using the modifiedBoston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).Results: There were no significant differences in achieving adequate cleansing observed between the RG and the control group (modified BBPS of 6-9; 88% vs. 88%). According to the logistic regression analysis of the RG, patients with a left colon resection had an oddsratio (OR) of 0.27 (p=0.003) for achieving a successful cleansing, and the low-volume preparation (OR=3.092, p=0.023) was the mainpredictor of a successful cleansing procedure. However, a longer time between colonoscopy and surgery was not related to unsuccessfulbowel cleansing.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that a history of colorectal surgery is not a risk factor for inadequate colon cleansing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YOO, I. K., JEEN, Y. T., CHOI, S. J., CHOİ, H. S., KEUM, B., KİM, E. S., CHUN, H. J., LEE, H. S., KIM, C. D. (2019). Evaluation of bowel preparation quality in patients with a history of colorectal resection. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 278–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/410032

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Lindsay DC, Freeman JG, Cobden I, Record CO. Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease? Br Med J 1988; 296: 167-9. [CrossRef] Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG, Prentice RS, Da Costa LR, Beck IT. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 422-7.
  2. Sim JS, Koo JS. Predictors of Inadequate Bowel Preparation and Salvage Options on Colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2016; 49: 346-9. [CrossRef] Mussetto A, Frazzoni L, Paggi S, et al. Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 917-24. [CrossRef] Lim SW, Seo YW, Sinn DH, et al. Impact of previous gastric or colonic resection on polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 1554-9. [CrossRef] Pontone S, Leonetti G, Lamazza A, et al. A retrospective case-control study evaluating the bowel preparation quality during surveillance colonoscopy after colonic resection. ISRN Gastroenterol 2014; 2014: 681978. [CrossRef] Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 620-5. [CrossRef] Hassan C, Fuccio L, Bruno M, et al. A predictive model identifies patients most likely to have inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 501-6. [CrossRef] Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 213-8. [CrossRef] Levack MM, Savitt LR, Berger DL, et al. Sigmoidectomy syndrome? Patients’ perspectives on the functional outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 10-7. [CrossRef] Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 60-3. Rex DK. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: entering an era of increased expectations for efficacy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 458-62. [CrossRef] Ohigashi S, Hoshino Y, Ohde S, Onodera H. Functional outcome, quality of life, and effica