Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Does periampullary diverticulum affect ERCP cannulation and post-procedure complications? an up-to-date metaanalysis

Sayfa
193–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

PAD also affectedthe occurrence of early pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Research conclusions differ on the impact of periampullary diverticulum (PAD) on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All statistical analyses were carried out with the Review Manager 5.3 software.Horizontal lines represented a 95% confidence interval (CI) and the area of each square in forest plots.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:PAD also affectedthe occurrence of early pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Research conclusions differ on the impact of periampullary diverticulum (PAD) on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP). An up-to-date meta-analysis evaluated the role of PAD in ERCP, especially in terms of cannulation failure and early complications. A comprehensive literature search was performed. All statistical analyses were carried out with the Review Manager 5.3 software.Horizontal lines represented a 95% confidence interval (CI) and the area of each square in forest plots. Twenty-six studies including23 826 patients with or without PAD who underwent ERCP were evaluated. PAD was associated with an increase in the overall cannulation failure rate (RR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.27-1.67; p<.00001), but in the subgroup of studies performed post-2000, PAD was irrelevant tocannulation failure (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.96–1.41; p=0.12). In overall analyses, PAD was also associated with a high risk of ERCP-relatedpancreatitis (RR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.59; p=0.003), perforation (RR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.06-2.82; p=0.030), and bleeding (RR=1.48, 95% CI:1.13–1.93; p=0.005). The presence of PAD increased the overall cannulation failure rate, but not the rate post-2000. PAD also affectedthe occurrence of early pancreatitis, perforation, and bleeding

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MU, P., YUE, P., Lİ, F., LİN, Y., LİU, Y., MENG, W., ZHOU, W., Lİ, X. (2020). Does periampullary diverticulum affect ERCP cannulation and post-procedure complications? an up-to-date metaanalysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 193–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/410017

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Wang AY, Yachimski PS. Endoscopic Management of Pancreatobiliary Neoplasms. Gastroenterology 2018
  2. [Crossref] 2. Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Afzali ES, Shahnazi A, et al. ERCP features and outcome in patients with periampullary duodenal diverticulum. ISRN Gastroenterol 2013
  3. [Crossref] 3. Omar MA. Effect of periampullary diverticulum on technical success and complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Single center experience. J Dig Endosc 2015
  4. [Crossref] 4. Major P, Dembinski M, Winiarski M, et al. A Periampullary Duodenal Diverticula in Patient with Choledocholithiasis - Single Endoscopic Center Experience. Pol Przegl Chir 2016
  5. [Crossref] 5. Ormeci N, Deda X, Kalkan C, et al. Impact of Periampullary Diverticula on Bile Duct Stones and Ampullary Carcinoma. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2016
  6. [Crossref] 6. Corral JE, Mousa OY, Kroner PT, Gomez V, Lukens FJ. Impact of Periampullary Diverticulum on ERCP Performance: A Matched Case-Control Study. Clin Endosc 2019
  7. [Crossref] 7. Anong J, Litchfield J, Young M, Borthwick T, Reddy C. Impact of Periampullary Diverticula on Success of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014
  8. S59-60. [Crossref] 8. Ugbarugba EE, Myo S. Periampullary Diverticulum and Cannulation Failure in ERCP. A Meta-Analysis of Studies. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2015
  9. AB355-6. [Crossref] 9. Todd H. Baron, Richard A. Kozarek, David L. Carr-Locke. ERCP. 2nd ed. Singapore: Elsevier
  10. Rossos P G KP, Haber G. Selective common bile duct cannulation can be simplified by the use of a standard papillotome. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1993
  11. [Crossref] 11. Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1999
  12. [Crossref] 12. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointestinal Endosc 1991
  13. [Crossref] 13. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996
  14. [Crossref] 14. Committee ASoP, Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2017
  15. [Crossref] 15. Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY. Periampullary diverticula: c