Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Long-term results of nonoperative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis

Sayfa
393–397
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The presence of appendicolith should not discourage physicians from prescribing nonoperative treatment for patients with uncomplicated AA

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: This study aimed to assess the long-term (>12 months) efficacy of nonoperative treatment (antibiotic administration) in the management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA).Materials and Methods: We surveyed uncomplicated AA patients who elected to undergo nonoperative treatment between 2010 and 2012.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Age, gender, presence of appendicolith, and white blood cell count on admission were analyzed as possible predictors of recurrence.Results: The median follow-up period of the study was 23 months.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The presence of appendicolith should not discourage physicians from prescribing nonoperative treatment for patients with uncomplicated AA
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: This study aimed to assess the long-term (>12 months) efficacy of nonoperative treatment (antibiotic administration) in the management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA).Materials and Methods: We surveyed uncomplicated AA patients who elected to undergo nonoperative treatment between 2010 and 2012. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the critical predictors of recurrence. Age, gender, presence of appendicolith, and white blood cell count on admission were analyzed as possible predictors of recurrence.Results: The median follow-up period of the study was 23 months. Twelve of 118 patients (10.2%) were diagnosed with recurrent appendicitis. Seven were retreated with the same antibiotic protocol and did not show further recurrence. The binary logistic regression analysis revealed statistical significance only for the presence of appendicolith [P=0.001, Exp (B)=0.058, B=-2.845]. Recurrence rate was lower in the presence of appendicolith.Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment of uncomplicated AA is an effective option. Recurrence is rare and it can be addressed efficiently with the administration of a second course of antibiotics. The presence of appendicolith should not discourage physicians from prescribing nonoperative treatment for patients with uncomplicated AA

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KIRKIL, C., YİĞİT, M. V., AYGEN, E. (2014). Long-term results of nonoperative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 393–397. https://ajindex.com/articles/409490

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 2002
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A populationbased analysis. JAMA 2001
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Guller U, Jain N, Curtis LH, Oertli D, Heberer M, Pietrobon R. Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2004
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Davies GM, Dasbach EJ, Teutsch S. The burden of appendicitisrelated hospitalizations in the United States in 1997. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2004
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 2009
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, et al. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2006
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Eriksson S, Granström L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1995
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Turhan AN, Kapan S, Kütükçü E, et al. Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009
  10. Sakorafas GH, Sabanis D, Lappas C, et al. Interval routine appendectomy following conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: Is it really needed? World J Gastrointest Surg 2012
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, et al. Initial non-operative management of periappendiceal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 2001
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Brown CV, Abrashimi M, Muller M, Velmahos G. Appendiceal abscess: Immediateoperation or percutaneous drainage? Am Surg 2003
  13. Mosegaard A, Nielsen OS. Interval appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand 1979
  14. Engkvist O. Appendectomy a froid a superfluous routine operation? Acta Chir Scand 1971
  15. Paull DL, Bloom GP. Appendiceal abscess. A