Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of 2222 colorectal polyps in 896 patients: A tertiary referreal hospital study

Sayfa
175–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We determined the clinical and histologic characteristics of colorectal polyps and consider that the detection rate of colorectal adenomas in patients under the age of 50 years may be increased by the widespread use of colonoscopy as a diagnostic test.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: In Turkey, there are a limited number of studies including the characteristics of colorectal polyps, and the number of patients was too small in most of them.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to evaluate histological characteristics of colorectal polyps that were determined by colonoscopy and clinical features of patients who had removal of the polyp.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent colonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively from January 2007 to December 2011.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We determined the clinical and histologic characteristics of colorectal polyps and consider that the detection rate of colorectal adenomas in patients under the age of 50 years may be increased by the widespread use of colonoscopy as a diagnostic test.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: In Turkey, there are a limited number of studies including the characteristics of colorectal polyps, and the number of patients was too small in most of them. The aim of this study was to evaluate histological characteristics of colorectal polyps that were determined by colonoscopy and clinical features of patients who had removal of the polyp.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent colonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively from January 2007 to December 2011. Adult patients (>=18 years) with no history of previous colorectal neoplasms who had removal of colorectal polyp were included.Results: A total of 2222 colorectal polyps were removed in 896 patients. Of these, 621 were male (69.3%) and 275 were female (30.7%). Most of the patients with polyps presented in the age group of 50-59 years (251 patients, 28%). It was recorded that 1816 (81.7%) of all polyps were adenomas. Of 1816 adenomas, 1577 (86.8%) were tubular adenomas. Of patients with adenomas, 19.7% was younger than 50 years. A total of 337 (37.6%) patients were in the high-risk group. Mean age of the high-risk patients was higher than the others (62±13 years and 58±13 years, respectively, p=0.001).Conclusion: This study is the largest series of colorectal polyps in Turkey to date. We determined the clinical and histologic characteristics of colorectal polyps and consider that the detection rate of colorectal adenomas in patients under the age of 50 years may be increased by the widespread use of colonoscopy as a diagnostic test.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SOLAKOĞLU, T., ATALAY, R., KÖSEOĞLU, H., SARI, S. Ö., DEMİREZER, A. B., AKIN, E., YÜREKLİ, Ö. T., SELVİ, E., BÜYÜKAŞIK, N. Ş., ERSOY, O. (2014). Analysis of 2222 colorectal polyps in 896 patients: A tertiary referreal hospital study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/409480

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Anwar S, White J, Hall C, et al. Sporadic colorectal polyps: management options and guidelines. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 4-11. [CrossRef] Bond JH. Polyp guideline: Diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Com- mittee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gas- troenterol 2000; 95: 3053-63. [CrossRef] Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, Steele RJ. The colorectal adenoma- carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 845-60. [CrossRef] Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS. A case-con- trol study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from col- orectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 653-7. [CrossRef] Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, et al. National Polyp Study data: Evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 633-9. [CrossRef] Jİrgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study. Incidence and death from colorectal carcinoma in an adenoma surveillance program. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28: 869-74. [CrossRef] Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. EPAGE II Study Group. Appropri- ateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Surveillance after polypectomy and after resection of colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 209-17.
  2. Bölümü, Ankara,
  3. Türkiye Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveil- lance after cancer resection: A consensus update by the Ameri- can Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 160-7. [CrossRef] Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 832-41. [CrossRef] Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 2000; 2: 105-19.
  4. Estrada RG, Spjut HJ. Hyperplastic polyps of the large bowel. Am J Surg Pathol 1980; 4: 127-33. [CrossRef] Achord JL. Hyperplastic colon polyps do not predict adenomas Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 1142-3.
  5. Bensen SP, Cole BF, Mott LA, et al. Colorectal hyperplastic polyps and risk of recurrence of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Pol- yps Prevention Study. Lancet 1999; 354: 1873-4. [CrossRef] Weston AP, Campbell DR. Diminutive colonic polyps: histopa- thology, spatial distribution, concomitant significant lesions, and treatmen Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiyet complications. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 24-8.
  6. Provenzale D, Garrett JW, Condon SE, Sandler RS. Risk