Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

What is gastritis? What is gastropathy? How is it classified?

Sayfa
233–247
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A good clinicopathologic correlation increases the accuracy of the diagnosis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Stomach endoscopic biopsies are made to determine the diagnosis of the illness, its stage, and follow-up after the treatment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is very significant to collaborate with the clinician while evaluating endoscopic biopsies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A good clinicopathologic correlation increases the accuracy of the diagnosis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Stomach endoscopic biopsies are made to determine the diagnosis of the illness, its stage, and follow-up after the treatment. It is very significant to collaborate with the clinician while evaluating endoscopic biopsies. Besides the clinical and laboratory information of the patient, the endoscopic appearance of the lesion should be known. The clinician and pathologist should use the same language and the same terminology. Although new classifications have been made to prevent the confusion of terminologies in neoplastic processes recently, most centers around the world have reported non-invasive neoplasias without giving any certain diagnosis by just commenting on it. The clinician should understand what the pathologist wants to say; pathologists should know the approach of the clinician (repetition of the biopsy, endoscopic resection, surgery). There is Helicobacter pylori (HP) in most of the stomach pathologies as the etiologic agent. No matter if the factor is HP or other etiologic agents, the tissue gives similar responses. That is why clinical-endoscopic indications should be taken into consideration, as well as histological indications, and the reports of the endoscopy should be seen. A good clinicopathologic correlation increases the accuracy of the diagnosis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYAÇETİN, S., GÜREŞÇİ, S. (2014). What is gastritis? What is gastropathy? How is it classified?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 233–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/409476

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Massimo Rugge MD, Robert M, Genta MD. Staging and grading of chronic gastritis. Hum Pathol 2005; 36: 228- 33. [CrossRef] Aydin O, Egilmez R, Karabacak T, Kanik A. Interobserver variation in histopathological assessment of Helicobacter pylori gastritis. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 2232-5. Price AB. The Sydney System: Histological division. J Gastroen- terol Hepatol 1991; 6: 209-22. [CrossRef] Price AB, Misiewicz JJ. Sydney classification for gastritis. Lancet 1991; 337: 174. [CrossRef] Demir M, Neşe N, Saruc M, et al. Features of incisura angularis bi- opsies in dyspeptic cases. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 211-3.
  2. El-Zimaity H, Ramchatesingh J, Saeed MA, et al. Gastric intestinal meta- plasia: Subtypes and natural history. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 679-83. [CrossRef] Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon MF, et al. Gastric mucosal atrophy: in- terobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 1249-59. [CrossRef] Alderuccio F, Toh BH. Immunopathology of autoimmune gastritis: lessons from mouse models. Histol Histopathol 2000; 15: 869-79. Nomura A. Searching for the causes of gastric cancer. Hawaii Med J 2002; 61: 33-4.
  3. Ozturk S, Serinsoz E, Kuzu I, et al. The Sydney System in the assess- ment of gastritis: Inter-observer agreement. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 36-9.
  4. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grad- ing of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Work- shop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20: 1161-81. [CrossRef] Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. Stolte M. Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: Japanese fairy tales or Western deficiency? Virchows Arch 1999; 434: 279-280. [CrossRef] Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M. Review of histological classifica- tions of the gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists. J Gastroenterol 2001; 36: 445-56. [CrossRef] Schlemper RJ, Hirata I, Dixon MF. The macroscopic classification of early neoplasia of the digestive tract. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 163-8. [CrossRef] Cornberg M, Enss ML, Makkink MK, et al. Variation of human mucin gene expression in gastric cancer cell lines and gastric mucous cell primary cultures. Eur J Cell Biol 1999; 78: 832-41. [CrossRef] Price AB. Classification of gastritis-yeste