Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6

Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal tumors

Sayfa
541–546
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our study will guide endoscopists in using ESD to remove large colorectal tumors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors is dangerous, particularly those that are large.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Between October 2012 and January 2015, 36 consecutive large colorectal tumors were resected by ESD at the endoscopic center of PLA Army General Hospital.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our study will guide endoscopists in using ESD to remove large colorectal tumors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors is dangerous, particularly those that are large. However, the technical difficulty in resecting large tumors in the colonrectum has seldom been investigated. Materials and Methods: Between October 2012 and January 2015, 36 consecutive large colorectal tumors were resected by ESD at the endoscopic center of PLA Army General Hospital. Five factors were investigated in predicting the technical difficulty in resecting such tumors. Results: En bloc resection, complete (R0) resection, and curative resection rates were 83.33% (30/36), 80.56% (29/36), and 77.78% (28/36), respectively. Tumor location in a flexure was risk a factor for difficult ESD in the colonrectum as measured by perforation (4.55, 0.09-6.25), non-en bloc resection (4.94, 0.10, 9.45), and dissection speed (?±SE: 1.75±0.05). When tumor size increased, the perforation rate also increased (9.93, 0.96-10.32). Conclusion: ESD was more technically demanding in flexures for resecting large colorectal tumors, and for large tumor effective technique to close perforation is essential. Our study will guide endoscopists in using ESD to remove large colorectal tumors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HE, Y., WANG, X., DU, Y., YUNG, V. Y., JIN, P., SHENG, J. (2016). Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in large colorectal tumors. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 6, 541–546. https://ajindex.com/articles/409430

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endo- scopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resec- tion of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resec- tion. Surg Endosc 2010
  2. [CrossRef] Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, Youk EG. Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic sub- mucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2012
  3. [CrossRef] Toyonaga T, Man-i M, East JE, et al. 1,635 Endoscopic submuco- sal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2013
  4. [CrossRef] Shiga H, Endo K, Kuroha M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissec- tion for colorectal neoplasia during the clinical learning curve. Surg Endosc 2014
  5. [CrossRef] Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010
  6. [CrossRef] Kim YJ, Kim ES, Cho KB, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes among different endoscopic resection methods for treating colorectal neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2013
  7. [CrossRef] Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, et al. Long-term adenoma re- currence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015
  8. [CrossRef] Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resec- tion. Dig Endosc 2015
  9. [CrossRef] Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K, et al. Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 2014
  10. [CrossRef] Zhang Y, Wang X, Xiong G, et al. Complete defect closure of gas- tric submucosal tumors with purse-string sutures. Surg Endosc 2014
  11. [CrossRef] Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I, et al. Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submu- cosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 2015
  12. [CrossRef] Jung da H, Youn YH, Kim JH, Park H. Endoscopic submucosal dis- section for colorectal lateral spreading tumors larger than 10 cm: is it feasible? Gastrointest Endosc 2015
  13. [CrossRef] Repici A, Hassan C, Pagano N, et al. High