Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

Radical resection of the pancreas should not always be necessary in the surgical management of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor in children

Sayfa
214–218
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Minimal resections such as enucleation or limited pancreatic resection with negative surgical margins should be performed in selected patients with no invasion to the main pancreatic duct or adjacent organs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a rare neoplasm in children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we aimed to present our surgical strategy based on minimal resection by enucleation or limited resection in localized pancreatic SPT.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of children who underwent surgical resection between October 2011 and September 2016.Results: Five female patients with a median age of 15 years (range, 14-17 years) were operated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Minimal resections such as enucleation or limited pancreatic resection with negative surgical margins should be performed in selected patients with no invasion to the main pancreatic duct or adjacent organs.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a rare neoplasm in children. In this study, we aimed to present our surgical strategy based on minimal resection by enucleation or limited resection in localized pancreatic SPT.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of children who underwent surgical resection between October 2011 and September 2016.Results: Five female patients with a median age of 15 years (range, 14-17 years) were operated. Tumors were located in the pancreatic head (n=4) or tail (n=1). The median greatest tumor diameter was 9 cm (range, 5-13 cm). All the patients were investigated with MRI before the resection to demonstrate the relationship between the tumor and the main pancreatic duct. Patients underwent enucleation (n=4) for head localization or local distal resection without splenectomy (n=1) at the pancreatic tail. At postoperative follow-up, major pancreatic leakage was observed in two patients and endoscopically treated. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. The median follow-up period was 44 months (range, 2-59 months) and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in the postoperative period.Conclusion: An optimal surgical strategy is still controversial in pancreatic SPT in children. Radical resections such as pancreaticoduodenoctomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy result in loss of pancreatic tissue for endocrine and exocrine functions. Minimal resections such as enucleation or limited pancreatic resection with negative surgical margins should be performed in selected patients with no invasion to the main pancreatic duct or adjacent organs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİVARCI, E., DÖKÜMCÜ, Ü. Z., ÇETİNGÜL, N., NART, D., BARBET, F. Y., ERGÜN, M. O., ÇELİK, A. (2017). Radical resection of the pancreas should not always be necessary in the surgical management of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor in children. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 214–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/409421

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Madan AK, Weldon CB, Long WP, et al. Solid and papillary epi- thelial neoplasm of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 2004; 85: 193-8. [CrossRef ] Rebhandl W, Felberbauer FX, Puig S, et al. Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (Frantz tumor) in children: report of four cases and review of the literature. J Surg Oncol 2001; 76: 289-96. [CrossRef ] Morikawa T, Onogawa T, Maeda S, et al. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: an 18-year experience at a single Japanese Institution. Surg Today 2013; 43: 26-32. [CrossRef ] Frantz V. Papillary tumors of the pancreas: benign or malignant? In: Frantz VK (ed) Atlas of tumor pathology. US Armed Forces In- stitute of Pathology, Washington, 1959. Pp. 32-3.
  2. Kloppel G, Solcia E, Longnecker DS, et al. Histological typing of tumors of the exocrine pancreas (WHO institutional histological classification of tumors). 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1996. [CrossRef ] Papavramidis T, Papavramidis S. Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: review of 718 patients reported in English literature. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200: 965-72. [CrossRef ] Yu PF, Hu ZH, Wang XB, et al. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a review of 553 cases in Chinese literature. World J Gas- troenterol 2010; 16: 1209-14. [CrossRef ] Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, et al. WHO Classification of Tu- mours of the Digestive System. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, 2010.
  3. Klimstra DS, Wenig BM, Heffess CS. Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a typically cystic carcinoma of low malignant po- tential. Semin Diagn Pathol 2000; 17: 66-80.
  4. Campanile M, Nicolas A, LeBel S, et al. Frantz's tumor: is mutilating surgery always justified in young patients? Surg Oncol 2011; 20: 121-5. [CrossRef ] Rojas Y, Warneke CL, Chetan A, et al. Primary malignant pancreatic neoplasms in children and adolescents: A 20 year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 2199-204. [CrossRef ] Ozturk Y, Soylu OB, Gurcu B, et al. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas as a cause of recurrent pancreatitis. Acta Gastroen- terol Belg 2008; 71: 390-2.
  5. Özkara S, Vardar Aker F, Yıtık A, et al. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a case series of 9 patients. Turk J Gastroenterol 2012; 23: 727-35. [CrossRef ] Morita K, Urushihara N, Fukumoto K, et al. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in children: surgical intervention strategies based on pathological findings. Pediatr Surg Int 2014; 30: 253-7. [CrossRef ] Laje P, Bhatti TR, Adzick NS