Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Lidocaine versus lidocaine plus benzydamine as a topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comparison study

Sayfa
224–227
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: Benzydamine, endoscopy, lidocaine, oral sprays, topical administration

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: The aim was to assess the efficacy of adding benzydamine (B) spray to standard treatment with a lidocaine (L) spray before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) as a topical anaesthetic regimen.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 118 adult patients undergoing outpatient UGE were randomly assigned to re- ceive L (n=44), LB (n=38) or B (n=36) before the procedure.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: Benzydamine, endoscopy, lidocaine, oral sprays, topical administration
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: The aim was to assess the efficacy of adding benzydamine (B) spray to standard treatment with a lidocaine (L) spray before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) as a topical anaesthetic regimen. Materials and Methods: A total of 118 adult patients undergoing outpatient UGE were randomly assigned to re- ceive L (n=44), LB (n=38) or B (n=36) before the procedure. The primary outcome was the patient tolerance score, which represents a summative evaluation of the taste of the anesthetic agent, the intensity of pharyngeal numb- ness, the amount of coughing or gagging and the degree of discomfort during oesophageal intubation. Results: The median (min-max) patient tolerance scores were comparable between groups LB (10.5; range 5-12) and L (10; range 4-13) (p=0.235) and significantly lower in group B (7.5; range 3-12) (p<0.01). LB improved several secondary outcomes. Oesophageal intubation was less difficult (5 [range 2-10] vs 3 [range 0 8], p<0.001), and a lower proportion of patients developed postprocedural sore throat (4 [10.5%] vs 15 [34.1%], p=0.011) in LB com- pared to L. Conclusion: LB is not superior to L in terms of overall patient tolerance, but LB may be preferred over L in cases with difficult oesophageal intubation or a previous history of postprocedural sore throat. Keywords: Benzydamine, endoscopy, lidocaine, oral sprays, topical administration

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İBİŞ, M., ARHAN, M., İBİŞ, T., ÖNAL, K. I., ERDAL, H., UTKU, Ö. G. (2015). Lidocaine versus lidocaine plus benzydamine as a topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comparison study. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 224–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/409390

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Froehlich F, Gonvers JJ, Fried M, et al. Conscious sedation, clinically rel- evant complications and monitoring of endoscopy: results of a nation- wide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 1994; 26: 231-4. [CrossRef] 2. Quine MA1, Bell GD, McCloy RF, et al. Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods. Gut 1995; 36: 462-7. [CrossRef] 3. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 620-7. [CrossRef] 4. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 707-8. [CrossRef] 5. Cohen LB, Wecsler JS, Gaetano JN, et al. Aisenberg J.Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 967-4. [CrossRef] 6. Ristikankare MK, Julkunen RJ. Premedication for gastrointestinal endoscopy is a rare practice in Finland: a nationwide survey. Gas- trointest Endosc 1998; 47: 204-7. 7. Fisher NC, Bailey S, Gibson JA. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gas- trointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 21-4. [CrossRef] 8. Daneshmend TK, Bell GD, Logan RF. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey. Gut 1991; 32: 12-15. [CrossRef] 9. Lachter J, Jacobs R, Lavy A, et al. Topical pharyngeal anesthesia for easing endoscopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-con- trolled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: 19-21. [CrossRef] 10. Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Jansson O, et al. A randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate topical anaesthesia of the pharynx in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1992; 24: 585-7. [CrossRef] 11. Canon K. O. Chan, K. L. Fok, et al. Flavored anesthetic lozenge versus Xylocaine spray used as topical pharyngeal anesthesia for unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized place- bo-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 897-901. [CrossRef] 12. Cantor DS, Baldridge ET. Premedication with meperidine and diaz- epam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy precludes the need for topical anesthesia. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 339-41. [CrossRef] 13. Chuah SY, Crowson CP, Dronfield MW. Topical anaesthesia in up- per gastrointestinal endoscopy. BMJ 1991; 303: 695. [CrossRe