Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients

Sayfa
30–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Endoscopic biliary stenting is safe and feasible for the management of difficult CBD stones in elderly patients, while double biliary stenting is superior to single stenting in maintaining higher stent patency rates.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic biliary stenting for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones in elderly patients.Materials and Methods: Elderly patients (>=65 years) with large (>=20 mm) or multiple (>=3) CBD stones were studied.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients underwent placement of single (n=34, group A) or double (n=30, group B) plastic stents at the time of initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Endoscopic biliary stenting is safe and feasible for the management of difficult CBD stones in elderly patients, while double biliary stenting is superior to single stenting in maintaining higher stent patency rates.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic biliary stenting for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones in elderly patients.Materials and Methods: Elderly patients (>=65 years) with large (>=20 mm) or multiple (>=3) CBD stones were studied. The patients underwent placement of single (n=34, group A) or double (n=30, group B) plastic stents at the time of initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Approximately 3 months later, stone removal was attempted at the second ERCP. The reduction of stone size and number before and after biliary stenting, complete stone removal, 3-month stent patency rate, and complications were compared.Results: The mean size (longitudinal/transverse diameter) of the CBD stones was significantly reduced after biliary stenting in both groups (p<0.001). Complete stone removal at the second ERCP was 94.1% in group A and 100% in group B (p=0.494). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that group B had a higher 3-month stent patency rate than group A (p=0.008). Conclusion: Endoscopic biliary stenting is safe and feasible for the management of difficult CBD stones in elderly patients, while double biliary stenting is superior to single stenting in maintaining higher stent patency rates.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YE, X., HUAİ, J., SUN, X. (2016). Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/409365

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of en- doscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996
  2. [CrossRef] Yasuda I. Management of the bile duct stone: current situation in Japan. Dig Endosc 2010
  3. 22(Suppl 1): 76-8. [CrossRef] Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter di- lation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006
  4. CD004890. [CrossRef] Binmoeller KF, Bruckner M, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1993
  5. [CrossRef] Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2000
  6. [CrossRef] Tyagi P, Sharma P, Sharma BC, Puri AS. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan- creatography. Surg Endosc 2009
  7. [CrossRef] Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, et al. Guidelines on the man- agement of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008
  8. [CrossRef] Lee TH, Han JH, Kim HJ, Park SM, Park SH, Kim SJ. Is the addition of choleretic agents in multiple double-pigtail biliary stents ef- fective for difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients? A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011
  9. [CrossRef] Ross SO, Forsmark CE. Pancreatic and biliary disorders in the el- derly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001
  10. 45, x. [CrossRef] van Erpecum KJ. Gallstone disease. Complications of bile-duct stones: Acute cholangitis and pancreatitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006
  11. [CrossRef] Pisello F, Geraci G, Li Volsi F, Modica G, Sciume C. Permanent stent- ing in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk pa- tients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008
  12. [CrossRef] Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001
  13. [CrossRef] Hui CK, Lai KC, Ng M, et al. Retained common bile duct stones: a comparison between biliary stenting and complete clearance of stones by electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003
  14. [CrossRef] Katsinelos P, Galanis I, Pilpilidis I, et al. The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones