Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5

Variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: What is the best prognostic score?

Sayfa
464–469
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although the AIMS65 score was not significantly different from the MELD, SOFA, and APACHEII scores, it was the optimum among them in terms of the prediction of mortality.Conclusion: AIMS65 score is the best simple and applicable scoring system for independently predicting mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: To find the most accurate, suitable, and applicable scoring system for the prediction of outcome in cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted comprising 120 cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding who were admitted to Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department in Sohag University Hospital, over a 1-year period (1/2015 to 1/2016).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) classification score, Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and AIMS65 score were calculated for all patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although the AIMS65 score was not significantly different from the MELD, SOFA, and APACHEII scores, it was the optimum among them in terms of the prediction of mortality.Conclusion: AIMS65 score is the best simple and applicable scoring system for independently predicting mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: To find the most accurate, suitable, and applicable scoring system for the prediction of outcome in cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices.Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted comprising 120 cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding who were admitted to Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department in Sohag University Hospital, over a 1-year period (1/2015 to 1/2016). The clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic parameters were studied. Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) classification score, Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and AIMS65 score were calculated for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all the measured parameters and scores.Results: Of the 120 patients (92 male) admitted during the study period, eight patients (6.67%) died in the hospital. Advanced age, the presence of encephalopathy, rebleeding, and higher serum bilirubin were independent factors associated with higher hospital mortality. The largest area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was obtained for the AIMS65 score and SOFA score, followed by the MELD score and APACHEII score, then CTP score, all of which achieved very good performance (AUROC>0.8). AIMS65 score showed the best sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values. Although the AIMS65 score was not significantly different from the MELD, SOFA, and APACHEII scores, it was the optimum among them in terms of the prediction of mortality.Conclusion: AIMS65 score is the best simple and applicable scoring system for independently predicting mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MOHAMMAD, A. N., MORSY, K. H., ALİ, M. A. (2016). Variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: What is the best prognostic score?. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 5, 464–469. https://ajindex.com/articles/409349

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of Hospitalization for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Population--Based Study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90
  2. Kapsoritakis A, Ntounas E, Makrigiannis E, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in central Greece: the role of clinical and endoscopic variables in bleeding outcome. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 333-41. [CrossRef ] 3. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 101-13. [CrossRef ] 4. Carbonell N, Pauwels A, Serfaty L, Fourdan O, Lévy VG, Poupon R. Improved survival after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis over the past two decades. Hepatology 2004; 40: 652-9. [CrossRef ] 5. Balanzo J, Such J, Sainz S, et al. Long term survival and severe rebleeding after variceal sclerotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 489-92
  3. Carey WD. Predictors of variceal bleeding: solving the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 1426
  4. Bambha K, Kim WR, Pedersen R, Bida JP, Kremers WK, Kamath PS. Predictors of early re-bleeding and mortality after acute variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Gut 2008; 57: 814-20. [CrossRef] 8. Das V, Boelle P-Y, Galbois A, et al. Cirrhotic patients in the medical intensive care unit: Early prognosis and long-term survival*. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 2108-16. [CrossRef ] 9. Ogihara T, Kikuchi K, Matsuoka H, et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2009). Hypertens Res 2009; 32: 3-107. [CrossRef ] 10. Pugh R, Murray‐Lyon I, Dawson J, Pietroni M, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646-9. [CrossRef ] 11. Barber K, Madden S, Allen J, Collett D, Neuberger J, Gimson A. Elective liver transplant list mortality: development of a United Kingdom end-stage liver disease score. Transplantation 2011; 92: 469-76. [CrossRef ] 12. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818-29. [CrossRef ] 13. Vincent J-L, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/ failure. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 707-10. [CrossRef ] 14. Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI blee