Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

High-dose vs. Low-dose Proton Pump Inhibitors post-endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

Sayfa
22–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, we anticipate the completion of more high-quality RCTs that will embrace distinct ethnicities, standardized endoscopic di-agnosis and management, double-blind strategies, and appraisal of results working specific standards over clear-cut follow-up periods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Present meta-analysis aims to evaluate studies of low- versus high-dose proton pump Inhibitors (PPI) post-endo-scopic hemostasis, including the newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to conclude whether low-dose PPI can gener-ate the comparable results as high-dose PPI.Materials and Methods: To identify suitable trials, the electronic databases PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Embase were used.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All RCTs concerning low- versus high-dose PPI administration post-endoscopic hemostasis published until December 2016 were identified.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, we anticipate the completion of more high-quality RCTs that will embrace distinct ethnicities, standardized endoscopic di-agnosis and management, double-blind strategies, and appraisal of results working specific standards over clear-cut follow-up periods.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Present meta-analysis aims to evaluate studies of low- versus high-dose proton pump Inhibitors (PPI) post-endo-scopic hemostasis, including the newly published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to conclude whether low-dose PPI can gener-ate the comparable results as high-dose PPI.Materials and Methods: To identify suitable trials, the electronic databases PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and the Embase were used. All RCTs concerning low- versus high-dose PPI administration post-endoscopic hemostasis published until December 2016 were identified. Primary outcomes were rebleeding rates, need for surgical intervention, and mortality.Results: Studies included a total of 1.651 participants. There were significantly less cases of rebleeding in the low-dose PPI treatment arm (p=0.003). All but one study provided data concerning need for Surgical Intervention and Mortality. The respective effect sizes were [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.35, 0.72-2.53] and [OR, 95% CI: 1.20, 0.70-2.05]. Both treatment arms were comparable considering the aforementioned outcomes (p=0.35 and p=0.51, respectively). Meta-regression analysis likewise unveiled comparable outcomes between studies using pantoprazole versus lansoprazole concerning all three outcomes [rebleeding (p=0.944), surgical inter-vention (p=0.884), and mortality (p=0.961)].Conclusion: A low-dose PPI treatment is equally effective as a high-dose PPI treatment following endoscopic arresting of bleeding. However, we anticipate the completion of more high-quality RCTs that will embrace distinct ethnicities, standardized endoscopic di-agnosis and management, double-blind strategies, and appraisal of results working specific standards over clear-cut follow-up periods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SGOURAKIS, G., CHATZIDAKIS, G., POULOU, A. P., MALLIOU, P., ARGYROPOULOS, T. A., RAVANIS, G., VAGIA, A., KPOGHO, I., BRIKI, A., TSURUHARA, H., STANKOVICOVA, T. (2018). High-dose vs. Low-dose Proton Pump Inhibitors post-endoscopic hemostasis in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 22–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/409308

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: CD002094. [CrossRef] 24. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of re-ports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996
  2. [CrossRef] 23. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. MetaWin. Statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2. Massachusetts: Sinauer As-sociates
  3. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Me-ta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006
  4. [CrossRef] 21. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Co-penhagen: The Cochrane Collaboration
  5. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring in-consistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003
  6. [CrossRef] 19. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Im-proving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999
  7. [CrossRef] 18. Mahid SS, Hornung CA, Minor KS, Turina M, Galandiuk S. System-atic reviews and meta-analysis for the surgeon scientist. Br J Surg 2006
  8. [CrossRef] 17. Yuksel I, Ataseven H, Koklu S, et al. Intermittent versus contin-uous pantoprazole infusion in peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized study. Digestion 2008
  9. [CrossRef] 16. Yilmaz S, Bayan K, Tuzun Y, Dursun M, Canoruc F. A head to head comparison of oral vs intravenous omeprazole for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers with a clean base, flat spots and adherent clots. World J Gastroenterol 2006
  10. [CrossRef] 15. Cheng HC, Kao AW, Chuang CH, Sheu BS. The efficacy of high-and low-dose intravenous omeprazole in preventing rebleeding for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and comorbid illnesses. Dig Dis Sci 2005
  11. [CrossRef] 14. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Focareta R, et al. High- versus low-dose proton pump inhibitors post-endoscopy haemostasisin patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a multicentre, randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008
  12. [CrossRef] 13. Hsu YC, Perng CL, Yang TH, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two different dosages of infusional pantoprazole in pep-tic ulcer bleeding. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2012
  13. [CrossRef] 12. Masjedizadeh AR, Hajiani E, Alavinejad P, Hashemi SJ, Shayesteh AA, Jamshidia