Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar
AI InsightA promising alternative would be to hear more voices from imaginative histopathologistsor morphologists together with some more insightful approaches, involving molecular-based techniques and stem cell research may be toevaluate mucosal pathology in CD.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
Özet
The diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) no longer rests on a malabsorptive state or severe mucosal lesions. For the present, diagnosis will alwaysrequire the gold-standard of a biopsy, interpreted through its progressive phases (Marsh classification). Marsh classification articulatedthe immunopathological spectrum of gluten-induced mucosal changes in association with the recognition of innate (Marsh I infiltration)and T cell-based adaptive (Marsh II, and the surface re-organisation typifying Marsh III lesions) responses. Through the Marsh classificationthe diagnostic goalposts were considerably widened thus, over its time-course, permitting countless patients to begin a gluten-free dietbut who, on previous criteria, would have been denied such vital treatment. The revisions of this classification failed to provide additionalinsight in the interpretation of mucosal pathology. Morever, the subclassification of Marsh 3 imposed an enormous amount of extra work onpathologists with no aid in diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis. Therefore, it should now be apparent that if gastroenterologists ignore thesesub-classifications in clinical decision-making, then on that basis alone, there is no need whatsoever for pathologists to persist in reportingthem. Since new treatments are under critical assessment, we might have to consider use of some other higher level histological techniquessensitive enough to detect the changes sought. A promising alternative would be to hear more voices from imaginative histopathologistsor morphologists together with some more insightful approaches, involving molecular-based techniques and stem cell research may be toevaluate mucosal pathology in CD.