Dergiler / E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Restenosis Rates After Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure Under Regional Anesthesia: Results of a Single Center Study with 553 Patients

Sayfa
178–183
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We thought that further studies, which investigate the rate of restenosis after CEA, should also evaluate the “type of the anesthesia management” as a factor on it.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the current gold standard management for carotid artery stenosis but there is still a debate on which closure technique is superior to lower postoperative restenosis rates.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this retrospective study is to assess “restenosis rates” of our 553 patients who underwent CEA “under regional anesthesia” with “primary closure” technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We thought that further studies, which investigate the rate of restenosis after CEA, should also evaluate the “type of the anesthesia management” as a factor on it.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the current gold standard management for carotid artery stenosis but there is still a debate on which closure technique is superior to lower postoperative restenosis rates. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess “restenosis rates” of our 553 patients who underwent CEA “under regional anesthesia” with “primary closure” technique. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent CEA, by non-shunting technique under regional anesthesia, with primary longitudinal arteriotomy closure between 2008 and 2019. Results: Five hundred and fifty three patients (409 male and 144 female) were evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of demographic characteristics, sides of stenosis, operation time, preoperative stenosis ratio, and postoperative hospital stay between the gender groups. None of the patients developed restenosis (stenosis rate of over 50%) after primary closure under regional anesthesia during the two-year follow-up period. Conclusion: According to our results, CEA with “primary closure under regional anesthesia” is a safe and effective surgical treatment for carotid stenosis without postoperative restenosis. We thought that further studies, which investigate the rate of restenosis after CEA, should also evaluate the “type of the anesthesia management” as a factor on it.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, F., ERDİNÇ, İ., BAŞ, K. (2021). Restenosis Rates After Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure Under Regional Anesthesia: Results of a Single Center Study with 553 Patients. E Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 178–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/408943

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Cheng I, Vyas KS, Velaga S, Davenport DL, Saha SP. Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure. Int J Angiol 2017;26:83-8
  2. Huizing E, Vos CG, van den Akker PJ, Schreve MA, de Borst GJ, Ünlü Ç. A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2019;69:1962-74.e4
  3. Marsman MS, Wetterslev J, Jahrome AK, et al. Carotid endarterectomy with primary closure versus patch angioplasty in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: protocol for a systematic review with metaanalyses and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026419
  4. Huizing E, Vos CG, Hulsebos RG, van den Akker PJ, Borst GJ, Ünlü Ç. Patch angioplasty or primary closure following carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Surg J (NY) 2018;4e96-e101
  5. Garzon-Muvdi T, Yang W, Rong X, et al. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: insight into risk factors and modification of postoperative management. World Neurosurg 2016;89:159-67
  6. Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA, Naddaf A, El-Shazly OM, Marone L, Makaroun MS. Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:678-83.e1
  7. Texakalidis P, Giannopoulos S, Jonnalagadda AK, et al. Carotid artery endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting for restenosis after carotid artery endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;115:421-9.e1
  8. Oszkinis G, Pukacki F, Juszkat R, et al. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: incidence and endovascular management. Interv Neuroradiol 2007;13:345-52
  9. De Witte CJ, Lammeren GW, Moll FL, Borst GJ. Does restenosis still hamper the benefit of carotid artery revascularization? ISRN Vascular Medicine 2013. P. 1–5. 10. van Lammeren GW, Peeters W, de Vries JP, et al. Restenosis after carotid surgery: the importance of clinical presentation and preoperative timing. Stroke 2011;42:965-71
  10. Ugurlucan M, Filik ME, Caglar IM, et al. Carotid endarterectomy using a “home-constructed” shunt for patients intolerant to cross-clamping. Surg Today 2015;45:284-9
  11. Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Likosky DS, Cronenwett JL; Vascular Study Group of Northern New England. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:897- 904
  12. Bonati LH, Gregson J, Dobson J, et al. Restenosis and risk of stroke after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic caroti