Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Water Immersion Versus Air Insufflation Colonoscopy Under Various Bowel Preparation Conditions

Sayfa
209–217
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

WI colonoscopy does not significantly increase ADR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: To investigate the differences between water immersion (WI) and air insufflation (AI) for colonoscopy under various bowel preparation conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this study, 526 outpatients were randomly assigned to two groups, namely a WI group (n = 263) and an AI group (n = 263).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:WI colonoscopy does not significantly increase ADR.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: To investigate the differences between water immersion (WI) and air insufflation (AI) for colonoscopy under various bowel preparation conditions. Methods: In this study, 526 outpatients were randomly assigned to two groups, namely a WI group (n = 263) and an AI group (n = 263). During the procedure, the quality of bowel preparation, abdominal pain score, cecal intubation rate (CIR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), the intubation times, and other indicators were recorded. After reaching the cecum, each group of patients was subdivided into one of four grades (excellent, good, fair, and poor) according to the quality of bowel preparation. Results: Under various bowel preparation conditions, the pain scores of the AI group were higher than those of the WI group (P .05). For the WI group compared with the AI group, the cecal intubation time (CIT) was prolonged under good bowel preparation (P = .045) and fair bowel preparation (P < .001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups on ADR in all patients (P = .476). Conclusion: Compared with AI colonoscopy, WI colonoscopy can decrease colonoscopy-related pain in patients for unsedated colonoscopy under various bowel preparation conditions, but there is no significant difference in CIR. WI colonoscopy requires longer CIT in patients with good and fair bowel preparation conditions. WI colonoscopy does not significantly increase ADR.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NIU, S., YANG, Y., SHANG, G., CHEN, Y., MA, Z., WU, F., ZHANG, H. (2021). Comparison of Water Immersion Versus Air Insufflation Colonoscopy Under Various Bowel Preparation Conditions. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 209–217. https://ajindex.com/articles/408864

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):844-857. [CrossRef] 2. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115-132. [CrossRef] 3. Hsu CM, Lin WP, Su MY, et al. Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(1):76-80. [CrossRef] 4. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(25):2345-2357. [CrossRef] 5. Seip B, Bretthauer M, Dahler S, et al. Patient satisfaction with ondemand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010;42(8):639-646. [CrossRef] 6. Chen SW, Hui CK, Chang JJ, et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy can significantly decrease post‐interventional abdominal discomfort in deeply sedated patients: a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(4):808-813. [CrossRef] 7. Leung CW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, et al. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation. Endoscopy. 2010;42(7):557-563. [CrossRef] 8. Radaelli F, Paggi S, Amato A, Terruzzi V. Warm water infusion versus air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(4):701-709. [CrossRef] 9. Brocchi E, Pezzilli R, Tomassetti P, et al. Warm water or oil-assisted colonoscopy: toward simpler examinations? Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(3):581-587. [CrossRef] 10. Leung FW. Water-related techniques for performance of colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(11):2847-2850. [CrossRef] 11. Cadoni S, Leung FW. Water-assisted colonoscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017;15(1):135-154. [CrossRef] 12. Leung JW, Salera R, Toomsen L, Mann S, Leung FW. Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(9):1997-2001. [CrossRef] 13. Leung JW, Mann SK, Siao-Salera R, et al. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(3):505-510. [CrossRef