Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

The 100 Most-Cited Articles in the Field of Colorectal Diseases from 1955 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis

Sayfa
221–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These 100 mostcited articles are of great significance for helping researchers understand this field over time.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: The number of times that an article is cited could reflect its impact.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: We identified the 100 most-cited articles using the terms “colorectal,” “colon,” “rectal,” “IBD,” “ulcerative colitis,” “Crohn’s disease,” or “colonoscopy” in Web of Science.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These 100 mostcited articles are of great significance for helping researchers understand this field over time.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: The number of times that an article is cited could reflect its impact. This study aims to recognize and analyze the characteristics of the most frequently cited articles in the field of colorectal diseases. Methods: We identified the 100 most-cited articles using the terms “colorectal,” “colon,” “rectal,” “IBD,” “ulcerative colitis,” “Crohn’s disease,” or “colonoscopy” in Web of Science. The articles were analyzed to evaluate the characteristics, including the number of citations, country of origin, the institution of origin based on the first author’s affiliation, study type, and others. Results: Of the top-cited publications, the number of citations ranged from 1575 to 9283, with a mean of 2504.11 citations. The journal with the greatest number of most-cited articles was the New England Journal of Medicine (n = 23), followed by Science (n = 14) and Nature (n = 12). These papers were published in 14 different countries, of which more than half were from the United States (n = 60). The most popular field was colorectal cancer (n = 45), followed by colon tumors (n = 21). Most of the papers were basic science studies (n = 43) and randomized controlled trials (n = 30). Regarding the level of evidence, there were 5 studies at level I, 29 at level II, and 5, 1, and 15 studies at levels III, IV, and V, respectively. Conclusion: Our study could provide a historical perspective on scientific progress in the field of colorectal diseases. These 100 mostcited articles are of great significance for helping researchers understand this field over time.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZHANG, C., LUO, M., ZHU, H., ZHOU, J., MIAO, L. (2022). The 100 Most-Cited Articles in the Field of Colorectal Diseases from 1955 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 221–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/408836

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP. The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010
  2. 92(10):1338-1343. [CrossRef] 2. Tsai YL, Lee CC, Chen SC, Yen ZS. Top-cited articles in emergency medicine. Am J Emerg Med. 2006
  3. 24(6):647-654. [CrossRef] 3. Yuan FF, Cai JZ, Liu B, Tang X. Bibliometric analysis of 100 topcited articles in gastric disease. BioMed Res Int. 2020
  4. 2672373. [CrossRef] 4. Yu QY, Tan S, Ren Y, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the 100 mostcited articles in the field of hepatology. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020
  5. 43(7):349-357. [CrossRef] 5. Heldwein FL, Rhoden EL, Morgentaler A. Classics of urology: a half century history of the most frequently cited articles (1955-2009). Urology. 2010
  6. 75(6):1261-1268. [CrossRef] 6. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009
  7. 302(10):1092-1096. [CrossRef] 7. AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J Vis Exp. 2019
  8. 152(152). [CrossRef] 8. Azer SA, Azer S. What can we learn from top-cited articles in inflammatory bowel disease? A bibliometric analysis and assessment of the level of evidence. BMJ Open. 2018
  9. 8(7):e021233. [CrossRef] 9. Fargen KM, Mocco J, Spiotta AM, Rai A, Hirsch JA. A pilot study of neurointerventional research level of evidence and collaboration. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017
  10. 9(7):694-697. [CrossRef] 10. Merlin T, Weston A, Tooher R. Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian ‘levels of evidence’. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Truelove SC, Witts LJ. Cortisone in ulcerative colitis
  12. final report on a therapeutic trial. Br Med J. 1955
  13. 2(4947):1041-1048. [CrossRef] 12. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017
  14. 67(3):177-193. [CrossRef] 13. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018
  15. 68(6):394-424. [CrossRef] 14. Bhandari M, Busse J, Devereaux PJ, et al. Factors associated with citation rates in the orthopedic literature. Can J Surg. 2007
  16. 50(2):119-123. 15. Powell AG, Hughes DL, Wheat JR, Lewis WG. The 100 most influential manuscripts in gastric