Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 8

Paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir treatment in renal transplant patients with hepatitis C virus infection

Sayfa
695–701
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

PrOD regime can be successfully and safely used in RT recipients with HCV infection withclose follow-up.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: The Social Security System of our country reimburses only paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir (PrOD)regime in treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C regardless of kidney disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PrOD in RT patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)infection in a single center real-life experience.Materials and Methods: RT recipients with a post-transplant follow-up of at least 1 year were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:PrOD regime can be successfully and safely used in RT recipients with HCV infection withclose follow-up.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: The Social Security System of our country reimburses only paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir (PrOD)regime in treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C regardless of kidney disease. Most of our renal transplant (RT) recipients were treated with PrOD. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PrOD in RT patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)infection in a single center real-life experience.Materials and Methods: RT recipients with a post-transplant follow-up of at least 1 year were included in the study. The patients weretreated and monitored according to the guidelines. Blood levels of immunosuppressive patients were closely followed up and adjusted.Results: A total of 21 (12 male and nine female) patients were assessed. The age of the patients was 50.8±8.5 years. Ten patients wereinfected with G1a, 10 patients with G1b, and one patient with G4 HCV. Two patients had compensated cirrhosis. Eighteen patientswere treatment-naive, and three were peginterferon+ribavirin-experienced. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was achieved in allpatients. None of the patients discontinued the treatment. Cyclosporine (Csa) and tacrolimus (Tac) doses were reduced to once a dayto once a week to maintain the blood level within normal range. The most common adverse effect was anemia in patients receivingribavirin. Renal functions did not change during the treatment period.Conclusion: In this real-life experience, all of the 21 PrOD-treated RT recipients reached SVR12. Tac or Csa serum levels were maintainedwithin the normal range with close monitoring. PrOD regime can be successfully and safely used in RT recipients with HCV infection withclose follow-up.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DANIŞ, N., TÖZ, H., ÜNAL, N., YILMAZ, M., TURAN, İ., GÜNŞAR, F., KARASU, Z., ERSÖZ, G., ÖZKAHYA, M., AKARCA, U. S. (2019). Paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir treatment in renal transplant patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 8, 695–701. https://ajindex.com/articles/408830

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Toz H, Nart D, Turan I, et al. The acquisition time of infection: a determinant of the severity of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease in renal transplant patients. Clin Transplant 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Kamar N, Marion O, Rostaing L, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir-Based Antiviral Therapy to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Kidney Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Sawinski D, Kaur N, Ajeti A, et al. Successful Treatment of Hepatitis C in Renal Transplant Recipients With Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents. Am J Transplant 2016
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Fernandez I, Munoz-Gomez R, Pascasio JM, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of interferon-free antiviral therapy in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 2017
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Lin MV, Sise ME, Pavlakis M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Acting Antivirals in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. PLoS One 2016
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Forns X, Charlton M, Denning J, et al. Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Hepatology 2015
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Health Mo. Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu Sağlık Uygulama Tebliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Tebliğ. TC Resmi Gazete. 2017
  8. 30175(4.2.13.3.2). 8. Scott DR, Wong JK, Spicer TS, Dent H, Mensah FK, McDonald S, et al. Adverse impact of hepatitis C virus infection on renal replacement therapy and renal transplant patients in Australia and New Zealand. Transplantation 2010
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Dulai G. Hepatitis C virus antibody status and survival after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Transplant 2005
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Zylberberg H, Nalpas B, Carnot F, et al. Severe evolution of chronic hepatitis C in renal transplantation: a case control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Alric L, Di-Martino V, Selves J, et al. Long-term impact of renal transplantation on liver fibrosis during hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterology 2002
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Cruzado JM, Carrera M, Torras J, Grinyo JM. Hepatitis C virus infection and de novo glomerular lesions in renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2001
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Ozdemir BH, Ozdemir FN, Sezer S, Colak T, Haberal M. De novo glomerulonephritis in renal allografts with hepatitis C virus i