Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Results of positive proximal margin after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: An analysis of 42 cases

Sayfa
88–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

If there is no distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, thenextirpating surgery should be encouraged as survival of the patients with positive and negative margins is not significantly different.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a tumor that invades the confluence of the left and right hepatic bile ducts.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Here, we report our experience on 42 patients who underwent surgicalresection for HC.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:If there is no distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, thenextirpating surgery should be encouraged as survival of the patients with positive and negative margins is not significantly different.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a tumor that invades the confluence of the left and right hepatic bile ducts. Surgery is the definitive treatment but is also technically demanding. Here, we report our experience on 42 patients who underwent surgicalresection for HC. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the margin status of resected specimens on frozen sections and theimpact of R1 resection margin on survival.Materials and Methods: A total of 42 patients with HC who underwent surgical resection in our clinic between January 2008 and January 2017 were included in the study. Patients’ charts were evaluated retrospectively.Results: The 1-, 2-, and 4-year overall survival rates of the 42 patients were 76.2%, 40%, and 10.7%, respectively. The median survivalrates of the patients with negative and positive proximal surgical margins were 22 (11.93-32.06) and 17 (14.43-19.56) months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups.Conclusion: In HC, surgery achieving negative proximal surgical margin is often very difficult. Our results demonstrate that frozen sections are reliable for the assessment of the invasion status of the proximal and distal ductal surgical margins. Although complete resection is potentially curative, survival of the patients with HC is still poor. If there is no distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, thenextirpating surgery should be encouraged as survival of the patients with positive and negative margins is not significantly different.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖTER, V., ÖZER, İ., DALGIÇ, T., BİNARBAŞI, C., ULAŞ, M., BOSTANCI, E. B. (2019). Results of positive proximal margin after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: An analysis of 42 cases. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 88–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/408793

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2005; 366: 1303-14. [CrossRef] De Jong MC, Marques H, Clary BM, The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multiinstitutional analysis of 305 cases. Cancer 2012; 118: 4737-47. [CrossRef] Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg 2013; 258: 129-40. [CrossRef] Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, et al. Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 84-92. [CrossRef] Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, et al. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 240-7. [CrossRef] Nishio H, Nagino M, Nimura Y. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Nagoya experience. HPB (Oxford) 2005; 7: 259-62. [CrossRef] Baton O, Azoulay D, Adam DVR, Castaing D. Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma type 3 and 4: prognostic factors and longterm outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 250-60. [CrossRef] Konstadoulakis MM, Roayaie S, Gomatos IP, Labow D, Fiel MI, Miller CM, Schwartz ME. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: is it justified? Audit of a single center’s experience. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 160-9. [CrossRef] Endo I, House MG, Klimstra AD, et al. Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 2104-14. [CrossRef] Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 140: 170-8. Geng Z-m et al. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a review. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19: 648-56. [CrossRef] Hemming AW, Reed AI, Fujita S, et al. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 693-9, discussion 699-702. [CrossRef] Lee J.H, Hwang D.W, Lee S.Y. The proximal margin of resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the effect of microscopic positive margin on long-term survival. The American Surgeon 2012; 78: 471-7.
  2. Shingu Y, Ebata T, Nishio H, et al. Clinical value of additional resection of a margin-positive proximal bile duct in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2010; 147: 49-56. [CrossRef] Cannon RM, Bro