Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Validity and reliability of the measure yourself medical outcome profile 2 (MYMOP2) questionnaire among Turkish patients having anorectal disorders

Sayfa
28–32
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Because it is brief and short to complete, it might be an important and free-to-use tool to measure the diseases, and it can enhance the patient-centered care within theTurkish health care context.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP2) is a patient-generated outcome measure allowing patientsto select the problems that are the most important to them and that they want to address, and it measures the effects of the problemfrom a wide range of health care interventions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The subjects were administered both theNottingham Health Profile and the TMYMOP2 questionnaires before the treatment session (initial visit) and at the control follow-upvisits (the first and second months, via e-mail or telephone calls).Results: The TMYMOP2 questionnaire was shown to be moderately valid (the Pearson correlation coefficient score between the totalscores of the subgroups of the two questionnaires were 0.335 and 0.642, respectively, p<0.05) and highly reliable (the Cronbach’s alfacoefficient score between the total scores of the subgroups of the two questionnaires were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.88 in the beginning and atthe first and second month follow-up visits, respectively).Conclusion: The TMYMOP2 was shown to be a low-to-moderately valid and a highly reliable scale.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Because it is brief and short to complete, it might be an important and free-to-use tool to measure the diseases, and it can enhance the patient-centered care within theTurkish health care context.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP2) is a patient-generated outcome measure allowing patientsto select the problems that are the most important to them and that they want to address, and it measures the effects of the problemfrom a wide range of health care interventions. This study aimed to translate the questionnaire into Turkish language (Turkish MYMOP-TMYMOP) and add this clinically useful measure to Turkish medical practice by assessing its validity and reliability.Materials and Methods: Fifty volunteers with anorectal disorders were prospectively included into the study. Each patient was enrolledinto a pelvic floor training biofeedback program, specific to their anorectal symptomatology. The subjects were administered both theNottingham Health Profile and the TMYMOP2 questionnaires before the treatment session (initial visit) and at the control follow-upvisits (the first and second months, via e-mail or telephone calls).Results: The TMYMOP2 questionnaire was shown to be moderately valid (the Pearson correlation coefficient score between the totalscores of the subgroups of the two questionnaires were 0.335 and 0.642, respectively, p<0.05) and highly reliable (the Cronbach’s alfacoefficient score between the total scores of the subgroups of the two questionnaires were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.88 in the beginning and atthe first and second month follow-up visits, respectively).Conclusion: The TMYMOP2 was shown to be a low-to-moderately valid and a highly reliable scale. Because it is brief and short to complete, it might be an important and free-to-use tool to measure the diseases, and it can enhance the patient-centered care within theTurkish health care context.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERSOY, Ö., TEMEL, Y. E., ALPTEKİN, H. K. (2019). Validity and reliability of the measure yourself medical outcome profile 2 (MYMOP2) questionnaire among Turkish patients having anorectal disorders. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 28–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/408789

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Lloyd H, Jenkinson C, Hadi M, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R. Patient reports of the outcomes of treatment: a structured review of approaches. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014; 12: 5. [CrossRef] Bowling A. Measuring Disease, 291-292 Buckingham: Open University Press 1995. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996; 312: 1016-20. [CrossRef] Paterson C, Britten N. In pursuit of patient-centred outcomes: a qualitative evaluation of the ‘Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile’. J Health Serv Res Policy 2000; 5: 27-36. [CrossRef] Polus BI, Kimpton AJ, Walsh MJ. Use of the measure your medical outcome profile (MYMOP2) and W-BQ12 (Well-Being) outcomes measures to evaluate chiropractic treatment: an observational study. Chiropr Manual Therap 2011; 19: 7. [CrossRef] Hull SK, Page CP, Skinner BD, Linville JC, Coeytaux RR. Exploring outcomes associated with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med 2006; 12: 247-54. [CrossRef] Paterson C. Seeking the patient’s perspective: a qualitative assessment of EuroQol, COOP- WONCA charts and MYMOP. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 871-81. [CrossRef] Jolles BM, Buchbinder R, Beaton DE. A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 791-801. [CrossRef] Hermann K, Kraus K, Herrmann K, Joss S. A brief patient-reported outcome instrument for primary care: German translation and validation of the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2014; 12: 112. [CrossRef] Chung VC, Wong VC, Lau CH, et al. Using Chinese Version of MYMOP in Chinese Medicine Evaluation: Validity, Responsiveness and Minimally Important Change. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 111. [CrossRef] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB: Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000, 25:3186-3191. [CrossRef] Küçükdeveli AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000; 23: 31-8. [CrossRef] Rowen D, Brazier J, Roberts J. Mapping SF-36 onto the EQ-5D index: how reliable is the relationship? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 27. [CrossRef] Yeşildal E. Diz osteoartrit hastalarinda mos uyku skalasinin türkçe çevirisinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi. 2015.
  2. Polus BI, Kimpton AJ, Walsh MJ. Use