Clinical report and analysis of 24 cases of multiple magnetic beads foreign body in gastrointestinal tract of children

All cases recovered smoothly after the operation, and no complications occurred during the follow-up.Conclusion: This study offers diagnosis and treatment methods for the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads and raises the awareness regarding the harmfulness of the presence of foreign bodies in the digestive tract.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯

Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: This study aimed to analyze the data of 24 cases of multiple perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads, to improve the understanding of its harmfulness to children and explore the best treatment.Materials and Methods: In total, 24 cases were collected and retrospectively analyzed.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:The medical history, number of magnetic beads, white blood cell (WBC) count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed.Results: There was no significant difference in age, gender, medical history, number of magnetic beads, and WBC count between the perforation group and non-perforation group, but there was a significant difference in CRP.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:All cases recovered smoothly after the operation, and no complications occurred during the follow-up.Conclusion: This study offers diagnosis and treatment methods for the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads and raises the awareness regarding the harmfulness of the presence of foreign bodies in the digestive tract.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: This study aimed to analyze the data of 24 cases of multiple perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads, to improve the understanding of its harmfulness to children and explore the best treatment.Materials and Methods: In total, 24 cases were collected and retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups: perforation group and non-perforation group. The medical history, number of magnetic beads, white blood cell (WBC) count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed.Results: There was no significant difference in age, gender, medical history, number of magnetic beads, and WBC count between the perforation group and non-perforation group, but there was a significant difference in CRP. After the diagnosis, 70% of the cases underwent laparotomy and perforation repair. All cases recovered smoothly after the operation, and no complications occurred during the follow-up.Conclusion: This study offers diagnosis and treatment methods for the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract caused by accidental ingestion of magnetic beads and raises the awareness regarding the harmfulness of the presence of foreign bodies in the digestive tract.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LI, X., ZHANG, Q., LU, S., LIU, T., YAO, Z., ZHANG, W., CHEN, Y., CHEN, L., XIE, F. (2020). Clinical report and analysis of 24 cases of multiple magnetic beads foreign body in gastrointestinal tract of children. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 11, 819–824. https://ajindex.com/articles/408720

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

Cheng W, Tam PK. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1265 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 1472-6
Digestive Endoscopic Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Ex pert consensus on the endoscopic treatment of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in China (2015, Shanghai). Chin J Digest End 2016; 33: 19-28
Sun J, Xu WY, Lv ZB, Huang Q, Wu YB, Sheng QF. Multiple magnetic foreign bodies in gastrointestinal tract: 3 cases report and literature review. Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics 2016; 31: 1339-42
Baierlein SA. Magnet ingestion. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110: 298
Waters AM, Teitebaum DH, Thorne Vivian, Bousvaros A, Noel RA, Beierle EA. Surgical management and morbidity of pediatric magnet ingestions. J Surg Res 2015; 199: 137-40
Silverman JA, Brown JC, Willis MM, Ebel BE. Increase in pediat ric magnet-related foreign bodies requiring emergency care. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62: 604
Naji H, Isacson D, Svensson JF, Wester T. Bowel injuries caused by ingestion of multiple magnets in children:a growing hazard. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28: 367-74
Bousvaros A, Bonta C, Gilger M, Noel RA. Advocating for child health: how the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenter ology, Hepatology, and Nutrition took action against high-powered magnets. J Pediatr 2014; 164: 4-5
Tsai J, Shaul DB, Sydorak RM, Lau ST, Akmal Y, Rodriguez K. In gestion of magnetic toys:reportof serious complications requiring surgical intervention and a Proposed management algorithm. Penn J 2013; 17: 11-4
Othman MY, Srihari S. Multiple magnet ingestion: The attractive hazardst. Med J Malaysia 2016; 71: 211-2
Pogorelić Z,Borić M, Markić J, Jukić M, Grandić L. A Case of 2-Year Old Child with Entero-Enteric Fistula Following Ingestion of 25 Mag nets. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2016; 59: 140-2
Cox S, Brown R, Millar A, Numanoglu A, Alexander A, Theron A. The risks of gastrointestinal injury due to ingested magnetic beads. S Afr Med J 2014; 104: 277-8
Bendig DW. Removal of blunt esophageal foreign bodies by flexi ble endoscopy without general anesthesia. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140: 789-90
Vijaysadan V, Perez M, Kuo D. Revisiting swallowed troubles:in testinal complications caused by two magnetsda case report, re view and proposed revision to the algorithm for the management of foreign body ingestion. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 511-6
Hussain SZ, Bousvaros A, Gilger M, et al. Management of ingest ed magnets