Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 11

Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sayfa
913–922
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, due to the insufficient diagnostic accuracy of 3D-EAUS for complex fistulas, 3D-EAUS combined with MRI examination can be used to more accurately detect the secondary extension of complex fistulas, so as to describe the complete anatomy of the fistula in more detail.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Anal fistula is a relatively common anorectal disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:An accurate assessment of the main anal fistula type and the anatomy of the internal opening before surgery is necessary to obtain the best surgical results.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, due to the insufficient diagnostic accuracy of 3D-EAUS for complex fistulas, 3D-EAUS combined with MRI examination can be used to more accurately detect the secondary extension of complex fistulas, so as to describe the complete anatomy of the fistula in more detail.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: Anal fistula is a relatively common anorectal disease. An accurate assessment of the main anal fistula type and the anatomy of the internal opening before surgery is necessary to obtain the best surgical results. Whether three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) should be used as the first-line diagnostic tool for anal fistula is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis of the published literature on 3D-EAUS and anal fistula, and compare the results of 3D-EAUS and surgery to evaluate the diagnostic value of 3D-EAUS for anal fistula. Methods: An online search of databases in English included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. After the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-EAUS of all anal fistula types was integrated, a single-group rate meta-analysis was performed; we analyzed 3D-EAUS separately for the diagnosis of different anal fistula types, and conducted a meta-analysis of test accuracy. The analysis combined sensitivity, specificity, and the respective 95% CI, to draw a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC), and estimate the area under curve (AUC). Results: Based on the inclusion criteria, we selected 8 studies covering 1057 cases of anal fistula and 548 cases of internal opening. The meta-analysis data show that 3D-EAUS has a total accuracy rate of 91% (95% CI, 88-94%). It has high sensitivity and specificity for different anal fistula classifications. The SROC curves for anal fistula internal openings were plotted, and the AUC was calculated to be 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89). Conclusions: 3D-EAUS can be used as the first-line diagnostic tool for anal fistula, because it has a high diagnostic accuracy for most anal fistulas. However, due to the insufficient diagnostic accuracy of 3D-EAUS for complex fistulas, 3D-EAUS combined with MRI examination can be used to more accurately detect the secondary extension of complex fistulas, so as to describe the complete anatomy of the fistula in more detail.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Lİ, J., CHEN, S., LİN, Y., ZHU, Z., YE, D., CHEN, F., QİU, S. (2021). Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 11, 913–922. https://ajindex.com/articles/408660

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Rosa G, Lolli P, Piccinelli D, Mazzola F, Bonomo S. Fistula in ano: anatomoclinical aspects, surgical therapy and results in 844 patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2006
  2. 10(3):215-221. [CrossRef] 2. Sudoł-Szopińska I, Kołodziejczak M, Szopiński TR. The accuracy of a postprocessing technique–volume render mode–in three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography of anal abscesses and fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011
  3. 54(2):238-244. [CrossRef] 3. Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology. 2006
  4. 239(1):18-33. [CrossRef] 4. Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI, Northover JM. Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg. 1989
  5. 76(7):752-755. [CrossRef] 5. Reginelli A, Mandato Y, Cavaliere C, et al. Three-dimensional anal endosonography in depicting anal-canal anatomy. Radiol Med. 2012
  6. 117(5):759-771. [CrossRef] 6. Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, et al. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology. 2004
  7. 233(3):674-681. [CrossRef] 7. Sun MR, Smith MP, Kane RA. Current techniques in imaging of fistula in ano: three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008
  8. 29(6):454-471. [CrossRef] 8. Mathew RP, Patel V, Low G. Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the firstline diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas. Radiol Med. 2020
  9. 125(2):155-156. [CrossRef] 9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010
  10. 8(5):336-341. [CrossRef] 10. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011
  11. 155(8):529-536. [CrossRef] 11. Almeida IS, Jayarajah U, Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN. Value of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound scan (3D-EAUS) in preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano. BMC Res Notes. 2019
  12. 12(1):66. [CrossRef] 12. Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Di Sarno G, et al. Role of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the preoperative assessment of perianal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015
  13. 30(4):535-542. [CrossRef] 13. Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A, et al. Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both? Radiol Med. 2019
  14. 124(5):339-349. [CrossRef]