Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Potential for improvement of common carp production efficiency by mechanical processing of cereal diet

Sayfa
143–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results suggest that pressed cereals increase yield in commercial production of common carp under semi- intensive conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The effect of supplemental feeding with modified cereals (pressed triticale, barley, rye and pressed wheat in combination with rape) on the growth of common carp was studied under semi-intensive pond farming conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For the evaluation, we employed five models designated M1 linear mixed models with a random intercept; M2 linear mixed models with a random slope; M3 a linear mixed model with a random intercept and slope; M4 written as model M3 with a power variance function, where the error variance was modelled and M5 written as model M4 with a power variance function, with a different model of error variance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results suggest that pressed cereals increase yield in commercial production of common carp under semi- intensive conditions.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The effect of supplemental feeding with modified cereals (pressed triticale, barley, rye and pressed wheat in combination with rape) on the growth of common carp was studied under semi-intensive pond farming conditions. Non- pressed triticale, barley and rye were used for comparison. Two groups were selected as a control dependent only on natural zooplankton. For the evaluation, we employed five models designated M1 linear mixed models with a random intercept; M2 linear mixed models with a random slope; M3 a linear mixed model with a random intercept and slope; M4 written as model M3 with a power variance function, where the error variance was modelled and M5 written as model M4 with a power variance function, with a different model of error variance. Model M5 took heterogeneous errors with respect to differing strata. Common carp that were fed supplements of modified cereals showed a significant lower variability of weight (lower SD and narrower 95% CI) compared to the non-pressed diets and pressed barley and rye that yielded higher production. These results suggest that pressed cereals increase yield in commercial production of common carp under semi- intensive conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MASİLKO, J., HARTVICH, P., ROST, M., URBANEK, M., HLAVAC, D., DVORAK, P. (2014). Potential for improvement of common carp production efficiency by mechanical processing of cereal diet. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 143–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/408063

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Kontrol, 19: 716-723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 Ao, Z. and Jane, J. 2007. Characterization and modeling of the A- and B-granule starches of wheat, triticale, and barely. Carbohydrate Polymers, 67: 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.04.013 Arlinghaus, R. and Hallermann, J. 2007. Effects of air exposure on mortality and growth of undersized pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) at low water temperatures with implications for catch and release. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 14: 155-160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00536.x Bartlett, M.S. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 160: 268-282. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1937.0109 Bauer, C. and Schlott, K. 2006. Reaction of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) to oxygen deficiency in winter as an example for the suitability of radio telemetry monitoring the reaction of fish to stress factors in pond aquaculture. Aquaculture Research, 37: 248- 254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01426.x Billard, R. 1999. The carp: biology and culture. Springer praxis books / aquaculture and fisheries series, Chichester, 342 pp. Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information- theoretic approach. 2nd. Ed., Springer, New York, 496 pp. Clements, K.D. and Raubenheimer, D. 2006.
  2. Feeding and nutrition, In: D.H. Evans (Ed.), The physiology of fishes. CRC Press, Boca Raton: 47-82. Czech Ministry of Agriculture. 2011. Report on situation and prospects – Fish, Prague [in Czech], 44 pp. Dumas, A., France, J. and Bureau, D. 2010. Modelling growth and body composition in fish nutrition: where have we been and where are we going? Aquaculture Research, 41: 161-181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2109.2009.02323.x FAO. 1997. FAO Fisheries Circular, vol. 886, Rome, 163 pp. Gassner, G., Hohmann, B. and Deutschmann, F. 1989. Mikroskopische Untersuchung pflanzlicher Lebensmittel. 5 Auflage, Wilhelm Röck, Ruhstorf. Hartman, P., Přikryl, I., Štědronský, E. 2005. Hydrobiology [in Czech], second revised edition, Informatorium Prague, 335 pp. Horn, M.H. 1998. Feeding and digestion. In: D.H. Evans (Ed.), The Physiology of Fishes. CRC Press.
  3. Microbial fermentation, Florida: 46-65. Horváth, L., Tamas, G. and Seagrave, CH. 1992. Carp and pond fish culture. Halsted Press an Imprint of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 158 pp. Hůda, J. 2009. Cereals efficiency i