Dergiler / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Impact of the presence of debris on semen analysis using an automated system (SQA-V)

Sayfa
211–215
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The results indicated that the performance of the SQA-V remains subject to the competency of the operator.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study examined the influence of the manual assessment of debris on the results of sperm concentra tion, progressive motility, and normal morphology measured using the SQA-V system (Medical Electronic Systems LLC, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Three measurements (sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal mor phology) of each sample were assessed using the 4 debris assessment levels: none/few, moderate, many, and gross.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The results indicated that the performance of the SQA-V remains subject to the competency of the operator.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study examined the influence of the manual assessment of debris on the results of sperm concentra tion, progressive motility, and normal morphology measured using the SQA-V system (Medical Electronic Systems LLC, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Methods: Sixty samples were analyzed simultaneously and independently by different operators using the manual technique and the SQA-V analyzer. Three measurements (sperm concentration, progressive motility, and normal mor phology) of each sample were assessed using the 4 debris assessment levels: none/few, moderate, many, and gross. Results: Given an optimal assessment of debris, the study data indicate that the SQA-V provided results that had very good agreement with those of the manual method: sperm concentration (rho=0.987, regression analysis formula: y=0.961x+1.962, p<0.0001), progressive motility (rho=0.949, regression analysis formula: y=0.989x+0.418, p<0.0001), and normal morphology (rho=0.694, regression analysis formula: y=0.678x+4.061, p<0.0001). Underestimation of de bris increased sperm concentration and decreased motility and normal morphology, while overestimation of debris decreased sperm concentration and increased motility and normal morphology. Conclusion: The results indicated that the performance of the SQA-V remains subject to the competency of the operator.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ILARDO, C., OSTENGO, V., EON, L., TRENTIN, J., VIGOUROUX, G. R., QUERE, G., SANGUINET, P. (2021). Impact of the presence of debris on semen analysis using an automated system (SQA-V). International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 211–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/406971

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Neuwinger J, Behre H, Nieschlag E. External quality control in the andrology laboratory: an experimental multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 1990;54(2):308–14
  2. Mortimer ST, Van der Host G, Mortimer D. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J Andr 2015;17(4):545–53
  3. Lammers J, Splingart C, Barriere P, Jean M, Freour T. Doubleblind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31(1):35–43
  4. Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
  5. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010
  6. ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standards; 2012
  7. Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, García-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59(7):491–500
  8. Frazer CG. Biological variation: from principals to practices. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2001
  9. Akashi T, Mizuno I, Okumura A, Fuse H. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men. Arch Androl 2005;51(6):437–42
  10. Agarwal A, Sharma RK. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer. Fertil Steril 2007;87(1):156–62.