Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

The impact of anorectal biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of patients with dyssynergic defecation

Sayfa
140–144
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Patients with chronic constipation not improved by dietary fiber and laxatives should be referred to specialized centers that have facilities for further anorectal physiological assessments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Dyssynergic defecation is a common health problem affecting the quality of life of patients adversely.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The impact of biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of patients having dyssynergic defecation was assessed using the validated Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire before and one month after therapy.Results: Thirty-two patients (20 female 62.5%, 12 male 37.5% and mean age 48 underwent three to ten sessions biofeedback therapy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Patients with chronic constipation not improved by dietary fiber and laxatives should be referred to specialized centers that have facilities for further anorectal physiological assessments.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Dyssynergic defecation is a common health problem affecting the quality of life of patients adversely. We aimed to evaluate the impact of biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of constipated patients due to dyssynergic defecation.Materials and Methods: Constipated patients due to dyssynergic defecation were enrolled to the study. Patients having secondary causes of constipation and who didn't fulfill the eligible criteria were excluded. All the patients underwent three to ten sessions each of which was thirty minutes biofeedback therapy under the supervision of a trained nurse. After one month the patients were assessed for the control. The impact of biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of patients having dyssynergic defecation was assessed using the validated Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire before and one month after therapy.Results: Thirty-two patients (20 female 62.5%, 12 male 37.5% and mean age 48 underwent three to ten sessions biofeedback therapy. Post-therapy improvements of subscores of SF-36 consists of eight domains were all statistically significant when we compared with the pre-therapy values.Conclusion: This study showed not only the effectiveness of biofeedback as a therapy modality for constipation but also its impact on the improvement of QOL of constipated patients due to dyssynergic defecation. Patients with chronic constipation not improved by dietary fiber and laxatives should be referred to specialized centers that have facilities for further anorectal physiological assessments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞAHİN, M., DOĞAN, İ., CENGİZ, M., ÜNAL, S. (2015). The impact of anorectal biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of patients with dyssynergic defecation. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 140–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/406426

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 750-9. [CrossRef] Shahid S, Ramzan Z, Maurer AH, Parkman HP, Fisher RS. Chronic id- iopathic constipation: more than a simple colonic transit disorder. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 150-4. [CrossRef] Chan AO, Cheng C, Hui WM, et al. Differing coping mechanisms, stress level and anorectal physiology in patients with functional constipation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 5362-6.
  2. Irvine EJ, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, Thompson WG, Rance L. Health-related quality of life in functional GI disorders: focus on constipation and resource utilization. Irvine EJ1, Ferrazzi S, Pare P, Thompson WG, Rance L. 2002; 97: 1986-93.
  3. Glia A, Lindberg G. Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 1083-9. [CrossRef] Surrenti E, Rath DM, Pemberton JH, Camilleri M. Audit of constipa- tion in a tertiary referral gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroen- terol 1995; 90: 1471-5.
  4. Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1510-8. [CrossRef] Rao SS. Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy. Gastroen- terol Clin North Am 2008; 37: 569-86. [CrossRef] Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Biofeedback treat- ment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1208-17. [CrossRef] Rao SS. Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 910-9. [CrossRef] Rao SS, Mudipalli RS, Stessman M, Zimmerman B. Investigation of the utility of colorectal function tests and Rome II criteria in dyssyn- ergic defecation (Anismus). Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004; 16: 589- 96. [CrossRef] Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller MJ, Schulze K, Brown CK, Paulson J. Psycho- logical profiles and quality of life differ between patients with dys- synergia and those with slow transit constipation. J Psychosom Res 2007; 63: 441-9. [CrossRef] Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health sur- vey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83. [CrossRef] Kocyigit H, Gulseren S, Erol A, Hizli N, Memis A. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Clin Rheuma- tol 2003; 22: 18-23. [CrossRef] Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M, Brown K, Nygaard I, Stumbo P. Random- ized c