Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Hematology / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Post-Marketing Analysis of Peripheral Neuropathy Burden with New-Generation Proteasome Inhibitors Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Yeni Jenerasyon Proteozom İnhibitörleriyle Olan Çevresel Nöropati Yükünün FDA Yan Etki Raporlama Sistemi Kullanılarak Pazarlama Sonrası Analizi

Sayfa
218–221
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Compared to BTZ, CFZ and IZB have lower rates of reported PN, with RORs of 0.19 (0.16- 0.22) and 0.48 (0.43-0.54), respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are an integral component of multiple myeloma therapies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Signal disproportionality analysis was reported using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Compared to BTZ, CFZ and IZB have lower rates of reported PN, with RORs of 0.19 (0.16- 0.22) and 0.48 (0.43-0.54), respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are an integral component of multiple myeloma therapies. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a well-known consequence of PIs, most frequently reported with earlier generations such as bortezomib (BTZ). There is a paucity of data highlighting the risk of developing PN with the new-generation PIs carfilzomib (CFZ) and ixazomib (IZB). This study evaluated reports of PN encountered with all three PIs using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (FAERS). Signal disproportionality analysis was reported using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). PN was reported in a total of 2.1%, 5.0%, and 10.9% of AEs with CFZ, IZB, and BTZ, respectively. The ROR (95% CI) for PN secondary to BTZ, CFZ, and IZB was 34.10 (32.76-35.49), 6.37 (5.50-7.37), and 14.97 (13.63-16.44), respectively. Compared to BTZ, CFZ and IZB have lower rates of reported PN, with RORs of 0.19 (0.16- 0.22) and 0.48 (0.43-0.54), respectively.

Abstract

Proteozom inhibitörleri (Pİ) multipl myelom tedavilerinin integral parçalarındandır. Çevresel nöropatiler (ÇN) Pİ’nin iyi bilinen bir sonucudur, bortezomib (BTZ) gibi önceki jenerasyonlarla daha sık bildirilmiştir. Yeni jenerasyon PI olan karfilzomib (KFZ) ve iksazomib (IZB) ile gelişen ÇN riskini vurgulayan çalışmalar yetersizdir. Bu çalışmada, Gıda ve İlaç İdaresi Olumsuz Olay (OO) Raporlama Sistemini (FAERS) kullanarak her üç PI ile karşılaşılan ÇN raporları değerlendirildi. Sinyal orantısızlık analizi, raporlama olasılık oranı (ROO) %95 güven aralığı (GA) kullanılarak yapıldı. ÇN; KFZ, IZB, BTZ ile sırasıyla OO’nun toplamında %2,1, %5,0, ve %10,9’unda rapor edilmişti. BTZ, KFZ, ve IZB’ye ikincil ÇN için ROO (%95 GA) sırasıyla 34,10 (32,76-35,49), 6,37 (5,50-7,37), ve 14,97 (13,63-16,44) idi. KFZ ve IZB ile, BTZ ile karşılaştırıldığında daha az ÇN rapor edilmişti, ROO sırasıyla 0,19 (0,16-0,22) ve 0,48 (0,43-0,54) id

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MİNA, S. A., MUHSEN, I. N., BURNS, E. A., SARFRAZ, H., PİNGALİ, S. R., XU, J., HASHMİ, S. K. (2021). Post-Marketing Analysis of Peripheral Neuropathy Burden with New-Generation Proteasome Inhibitors Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Turkish Journal of Hematology, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 218–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/405611

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7-33
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30
  3. Kazandjian D. Multiple myeloma epidemiology and survival: a unique malignancy. Semi Oncol 2016;43:676-681
  4. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008;111:2516- 2520
  5. Beijers AJ, Vreugdenhil G, Oerlemans S, Eurelings M, Minnema MC, Eeltink CM, van de Poll-Franse LV, Mols F. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in multiple myeloma: influence on quality of life and development of a questionnaire to compose common toxicity criteria grading for use in daily clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:2411-2420
  6. Velasco R, Alberti P, Bruna J, Psimaras D, Argyriou AA. Bortezomib and other proteosome inhibitors—induced peripheral neurotoxicity: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2019;24:S52-62
  7. Arastu-Kapur S, Anderl JL, Kraus M, Parlati F, Shenk KD, Lee SJ, Muchamuel T, Bennett MK, Driessen C, Ball AJ, Kirk CJ. Nonproteasomal targets of the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib: a link to clinical adverse events. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2734-2743
  8. Kirk CJ, Jiang J, Muchamuel T, Dajee M, Swinarski D, Aujay M, Bennett MK, Yang J, Lewis E, Laidig G, Molineaux CJ. The selective proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib is well tolerated in experimental animals with dose intensive administration. Blood 2008;11211:2765 (abstract)
  9. Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Oriol A, Orlowski RZ, Ludwig H, Facon T, Hajek R, Weisel K. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1327-1337
  10. ClinicalTrials.gov. Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (CLARION). Last Update: 2019. Available online at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/NCT01818752
  11. Martin TG. Peripheral neuropathy experience in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib. Oncology (Williston Park) 2013;27(Suppl 3):4-10
  12. Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, Bahlis NJ, Hansson M, Pour L, Sandhu I, Ganly P, Baker BW, Jackson SR, Stoppa AM. Ora